
W72's original post sparks a vital discussion about Audemars Piguet's brand identity, questioning whether its overwhelming association with the Royal Oak collection is sustainable or intended. This article delves into community perspectives on AP's diverse heritage and its contemporary offerings beyond the iconic octagonal bezel, exploring what defines the brand for collectors today.

Even if AP went 100% Royal Oak (which won't happen), I would still love the brand. I've never suffered angst over the predominance of the Royal Oak in AP's lineup. M4
back in the early 70s and 80s AP is among the top brand and with many offerings... but now it is principally known (which I agree is incorrect for those who knows the brand deeply) to be ROs.
...but I'll throw in the John Schaeffer line as further proof of what they could do. Hodinkee
VC and Breguet integrate their DNA into a diverse range of designs, whereas AP seem to think DNA=one or two designs. You could specify any watch shape and complications and imagine what a Breguet design fulfilling that brief would look like. Much harder for AP, at least for me. Maybe AP think their approach is best financially, or maybe they think it's what their fans want, I don't know, but the others are much more interesting to me. If AP does more with [Re]master, it will be a step in the rig
John Schaeffer is a splendid example of what AP can be... I love this series... and wish I had the means then... Thanks for showing them here.
and I too find the somewhat "challenging". Maybe I am too old school and these new design concepts are like that..
This thread is active on the Audemars Piguet forum with 30 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →