
M4's initial post on a new Audemars Piguet novelty sparked significant discussion among collectors, highlighting a potential shift in AP's design direction. This article delves into the community's immediate reactions to the watch's aesthetics, movement, and market positioning. It offers a valuable snapshot of collector sentiment at the time of its release, providing context for how this model was perceived.

Is it for sale?
500 piece LE, modeled after a 1940s chronograph, but not a replica. I totally love it, even the 2-tone, which is usually a no go for me. $50k, so not inexpensive. M4
The price may be a bit optimistic given the market conditions, but for a lot of us, the first desirable dress AP in a long time. If not a sales darling, the press will be dying to get their hands on this to review. I would wear this with joy, as the 1940s were a golden age for chronographs. Obviously some nitpicks with Geneve on the dial, but I hope this is the start of a retro collection. A perpetual calendar and triple calendar at the $12,000 price point would be welcome follow ups.
The steel, rose, and gilt make a dissonant harmony of another age. The movement, however, really seems posed to carry AP forward, and is beautiful in form and finish.
Iām not a two-tone guy, but this will appeal to many others. Maybe Iām asking for too much but, at this price point, part of me thinks that it should be manually-wound.
This thread is active on the Audemars Piguet forum with 20 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →