Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26300 Review
Review

Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26300 Review

By orangedial · Mar 12, 2014 · 28 replies
orangedial
WPS member · Audemars Piguet forum
28 replies16149 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Orangedial provides an intimate, long-term review of his Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph Ref. 26300, sharing why he chose the 39mm classic over the newer 41mm Ref. 26320. His post delves into the exquisite details of the watch, from its tapisserie dial to its case construction, complemented by stunning photography. He offers a candid assessment of its functional aspects and versatility, making a strong case for its enduring appeal in his collection.

I have this 39mm ROC ref.26300 for more than a year and I must say that the level of details from every part of the watch has never failed to amaze me. I had a choice of either the new 41mm ROC ref. 26320 or this 39mm one at the time of purchase. After much trial on the wrist and long consideration, I decided on the 26300 as the classic size wears nicer on my wrist, and this reference looks sportier to me with the numeric seconds on the outer rim of the dial, the triangle 12-o'clock indicator, shorter hour indicators and a more cohesive monotone sub-dials with rail-track motif.



As all other RO, the tapisserie dial is one of the most attractive details of the watch. It is carved out from a blank piece of brass using a century-old machine. It is not difficult to observe those fine concentric lines weaving over the tiny squares of the tapisserie dial. Such pattern allows the dial to look more 'brilliant' when the light hits on it.



The case construction of the ROC is what attracted me to this reference. The entire watch looks decidedly masculine with a beefier octagonal bezel. The handsome screw-down chronograph pushers with hexagonal screw locks integrated beautifully with the smooth profile of the crown guards. The finishing of the ROC is unmatchable. My only gripe is that the AP logo on the crown would look more expensive if it is embossed rather than engraved.

 







I have to admit that the screw-down chronograph pushers are utterly inconvenient if you plan to use the chronograph function regularly. The screw locks are not easy to unscrew when the watch is on the wrist. It is possible to leave the locks at the unscrewed position, however the water resistance would be compromised. For me, all these functional issues are of no importance because I don't use my ROC for timekeeping. I happen to value its beautiful form rather than its functional substance.

 



The ROC is such a versatile watch it suits every occasion from casual to black tie. While it looks best in the remarkable RO bracelet, I find it equally stunning in leather strap. AP's leather strap is soft and very comfortable to wear, and it mellows down the glitter of ROC and transforms it into a very gentlemanly watch. 





Many people gripes about the lack of in-house movement for ROC. However, I find the F. Piguet movement very accurate and the chronograph pushers give the best feeling when depressed compared to all other chronographs I've handled so far. All in all, this ROC 26300 is a winner to me and it will remain in my small collection for a long time.

Thanks for reading!

Wayne

About the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph Ref. 26320

The Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph reference 26320 represents the 41mm chronograph variant within the Royal Oak collection. This reference was produced from 2012 to 2019, featuring a blue dial configuration in stainless steel construction.

The 26320 houses the automatic caliber 2385 movement, providing a 40-hour power reserve. The 41mm stainless steel case incorporates a fixed octagonal bezel and sapphire crystal, with 50-meter water resistance. The blue dial is paired with a steel bracelet, maintaining material consistency throughout the piece.

This reference appeals to collectors seeking a contemporary Royal Oak chronograph in stainless steel with the distinctive blue dial option. The 41mm case size positions it as a modern interpretation within the chronograph series, offering automatic winding convenience with the caliber 2385 movement during its seven-year production period.

Specifications

Caliber
2385
Case
Stainless steel
Diameter
41 mm
Dial
Blue
Water Resist.
50m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
FO
foversta
Mar 12, 2014

Thanks a lot for this presentation of a watch I consider as one of the most beautiful chronographs... Your pics highlight its beauty. The FP movement? At least, it is an integrated chronograph movement... and a very valuable one... this is one answer to give to the comments about the origin of the movement. Thanks! Fx

MI
MichaelC
Mar 12, 2014

I definitely prefer the 39mm model. The triangular marker at 12 is charming and unique. You have really captured the beauty of this watch with your photos. It is quite possibly the most successful "if you can only own one single AP" AP :-) Wear it with shorts and a polo or a suit; take it into the board room or the ocean. This watch does it all. And, being a reference 26300, you have the functional bolt/nut case construction (whereas older reference 25860s with this dial do not). Thanks for shar

ED
Edz
Mar 12, 2014

I've bought and sold this watch a few times. I usually regret selling it because I reckon it's one of the best chronographs going around. The price on the secondhand market, I think, makes it a bargain. You're getting a hell of a watch for the money.

SP
Spellbound
Mar 12, 2014

Hey Wayne, Much as I think the watch is gorgeous, I am more blown away by your excellent photographic skills ! You should have a go posting on the weekly Wristscan and Static Photo competition on his forum. You will definitely win with this level of photography! Warmest, Dean

LU
Luis6
Mar 12, 2014

It fits you perfectly. The blue lume on silver white dial is just beautiful. I also have small wrists so fully appreciate the beauty of the 39mm case Royal Oaks.

TI
tim_s
Mar 12, 2014

I want to echo the amazing photo comments. These are all really impressive! I picked up a second hand 26300 in January, excuse the useless photo: I know I haven't owned it for long, but I completely agree with your comments. The finishing, especially the polishing and beveling and the small details on this watch is really incredible and the bracelet is a work of art. I actually really like how the dial goes under the radar until you get up close (your photos really shows this) and then you see s

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Audemars Piguet forum with 28 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →