Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Jumbo Vintage Review
Vintage

Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Jumbo Vintage Review

By amanico · Sep 16, 2009 · 98 replies
amanico
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
98 replies23784 views16 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Amanico's 'Quick View on the Vintage Royal Oak Jumbo' provides a fascinating before-and-after account of restoring a vintage Audemars Piguet Royal Oak. This post is invaluable for collectors considering vintage AP acquisitions and restoration, offering a detailed comparison between its original condition and the results of a full factory service. Amanico thoughtfully explores the watch's design philosophy and its kinship with other iconic Genta designs.

98 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →


Maybe you remember that a few months ago, I bought this Royal Oak:





The bezel was certainly polished by Borat himself, the dial had an awesome patina, the hands too, but maybe let guess some problems with the water resistance of the watch.

The case and case back were in so so condition, and the bracelet was too loose.

So, I sent it to AP to see what they can do to restore it.

5 months after, the watch was back, with new old stock bracelet and dial, the hands were changed, as well as the bezel, and the case / case back polished.

The movement was totally serviced.

All I can do is that I'm really impressed by the quality of the work done by AP on my watch.

You may judge by yourself, with the pics I'll post.

So, I rediscovered the Royal Oak...

This is indeed a strange watch.

you all know the story, so I will make it short:

When in 1972, AP introduced the Royal Oak, they had in mind to release a luxury sport watch, which was a " Grande Premiere "...

PP did the same a bit later with the Nautilus ( in 1976 ).

Another common point between AP and PP is that the designer of this watch is the same: Gerald Genta.

When I came back home with my Royal Oak, this kinship between these 2 watches literally jumped to my eyes...

There is obviously an " air de famille "!



The Grey blue dial, the shape of the hands, the angular bezel, the whole philosophy of these 2 watches are all shared points, and it would have been closer if I had the 5711 for this comparison picture.

" Luxury Sport Watch " ... A perfect definition for this Royal Oak?

At this moment, in the 70ies, maybe, but nowadays?

Its precious look, its stunning thinness, the superb angular bezel, this very sober dial, and straight and narrow hands, the finish and design of the bracelet and of the case...All this may lead to you practice your favourite sport with?

IMO, no way!

I'd rather describe it as a very dressy casual watch.





The shape of the case and bezel are dynamic, indeed, and deeply contrasts with the simplicity, the sober elegance of the dial whose only distraction is the date, no second hand, which is, to me, a good thing aesthetically speaking.

This deep grey blue is a pure marvel:



Do you see the top of the " hobnail "?

It is alsmost brown, as the tritium indexes are.

My only regret is that the hands are luminova, but tritium hands don't exist anymore...

The " AP Logo is just above " 6 ", as it has to be on a vintage jumbo ( while, no the modern jumbo, it is at 12, instead of the 12 ) :



The " Audemars Piguet Automatic " writings are thinner on the Vintage, and the applied indexes are longer and thinner, too, compared to the Modern:



The Solid case back hides a very nice movement, the Cal 2121, which was in fact a JLC Cal 920 reworked by AP ( Thomas, please correct me if I'm wrong ), and it is quite a pity that this movement can't be seen, but maybe at this moment, people wasn't very interested in seeing it?

Here, the movement in Patrice's modern Royal Oak jumbo:



And here, the Vintage solid case back:



The brushed finish of the bracelet is echoing with the case, and the top of the bezel, the only polished parts being the sides of the bezel and of the case back:



Don't be mistaken by the previous pics I posted here, the very amazing thing, and maybe which gives it this sublime allure, is the thinness of the case:



The crown is aesthetically reaching the perfection.

Its size is in harmony with the case, not too big nor too small, and its shape is just the cherry on the cake, matching with the shape of the bezel.

The only reserve is about the comfort when winding the watch...A pain for the fingers, but it is the price ( or a tribute ) to pay to its beauty.

The whole watch is playing with light, or, better said, which loves to play with light, from the case to the dial...

It is indeed a real pleasure for the eyes.



Dynamic and simple, yet powerful and very classy, it is a very appealing watch.

Luxury?

Yes, without doubt, as you feel its quality, instantaneously.

Sporty?

That's maybe what you can think from the pics, but I can tell you that once you get it in your hands, or, better, once you try it on your wrist, you're ..;Surprised, by its thinness, by its comfort, by its extrem elegance, which is not really what you expect from a classic sporty watch.





The jumbo, IMO, has a perfect size, with its 39 mm.

It was conceived in this size, and to me, this is the ideal Royal Oak.

A Magic Watch.



Hope you will enjoy this hommage to this watch.

Best to All.

Nicolas This message has been edited by amanico on 2009-09-16 02:42:30 This message has been edited by MTF on 2009-09-17 19:05:40

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
BD
BDLJ
Sep 16, 2009
Only after...

...seeing the new bezel did I realise how badly the old one was abused, and how much it ruined the aesthetics. The new one really brings the watch back to life. AP definitely did a good job with that, but you know me....original hands and dial, unless they're threatening to ruin the watch. But the thing is with this one is that the new bezel really softens the watch compared to the harsh polish of the 'ruined' bezel. So all considered, fantastic.

AM
amanico
Sep 16, 2009
I regret the old tritium hands, Ben

But will as if it is possible to get my old ones... As for the bezel no regrets at all! The dial is an old one, with tritium indexes, and shows a very nice patina. Best, my friend. Nicolas

DR
DrStrong
Sep 16, 2009
Nice but....

did they keep the old dial ? I really liked the tropical look.... Here's my ex A Serie

MO
Mostel
Sep 16, 2009
One of my very favorite watch

This era of AP is just..... Ultimately Iconic. Few watches equal the importance, the influence, the quality, of this one. The Daddy of the ROO and maybe , just maybe the most influential watch design of all time? Arguable... I love my 15002st. Congrats on a sensational renewal of this very rare and most stunning timepiece!

AM
amanico
Sep 16, 2009
An important watch, indeed, Mostel

And a difficutl to beat, in terms of Ourity and Beauty! Best, my friend. Nicolas

TH
ThomasM
Sep 16, 2009
There you go, that's the correct clasp for A, B, and early C series.

Very nice, Dr.Strong! My favorite, even if later editions were better built and "more solid." Kinda like vintage Lambos and Ferraris where the headliner and dash don't quite fit perfectly compared to modern Audis and even Toyotas, but they just make the soul sing! Here's a thread on the intangible psycho-dynamics as it pertains to cars - Porsche 911 Turbo vs Nissan GT-R: click here

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 98 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →