
quattro's exploration of Audemars Piguet's vintage chronographs and their modern reinterpretation, the [Re]master01, offers a compelling look at the brand's design heritage. This article delves into the aesthetic DNA that connects these historical pieces to contemporary releases, prompting a discussion among collectors about design choices, movement selection, and market reception. quattro's detailed photographic essay provides the perfect backdrop for understanding the enduring appeal and challenges of vintage-inspired watchmaking.
















These vintage push my buttons. Dreams...
Would be a serious competitor to VC cow's horns. Price is not bad imo but 15mm is too unbearable for me.
A lot of the other aspects seems very attractive to me.
I think I could do with the modern caliber, but not with the thickness. Such a pity, such a lost opportunity…
and a true contender to the CdV. But, as shows the recent launch of the [Re]master02 (which is another missed opportunity imo) AP doesn’t seem to fully believe in these pieces: I mean, they have no intention to make them a solid part of their current catalog, unfortunately.
My favourite is the possibly the first one, though the Ref 1533 and (Re)master01 are not far behind. It's interesting how Audemars Piguet was able to establish a DNA with this small collection. They all have some common style elements. When sold brand new, mutli-watch collections weren't really a thing. Something like the Ref 1533, could have been overlooked for something more conventionally beautiful like the Patek Ref 130. The (Re)Master is indeed a bit thick, but the proportions are okay. It'
This thread is active on the Audemars Piguet forum with 22 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →