
foversta provides an exclusive report on the annual Bell & Ross cocktail event held at the prestigious Salon d'Honneur in Les Invalides, Paris. This post highlights the brand's deep connection to French military heritage and celebrates the co-founders' recognition with the Légion d'Honneur. Readers gain insight into Bell & Ross's brand identity and key partnerships, such as the collaboration with Dassault Aviation.



































My opinion is simple, maybe simplist? But honestly, seriously, housing tourbillons on military watches is a total non sense, and totally counter productive. For the Tourbillons, which are now seen everywhere, a strange way to promote this horolgical sophistication. For Military watches, which cannot be treated seriously when housing a tourbillon. What kind of army will use a tourbillon??? I will say it straight: This is stupid. Best, Nicolas
You have the right to like them or not. The purpose of these Tourbillon watches is not be used by an army of course. I hope I will not disappoint you or spoil your Sunday: the military watches or military-inspired watches (more likely the case here) are not only used by army guys or soldiers. More seriously, I think you would have been aware that for several years, there is an increasing demand from customers for Tourbillons inside more all-around, more daring, more exciting and not-so-classic w
in B&R's stable. A proprietary complication devised by one of the greatest horological masters, available for a reasonable price. Is there more tho ask for? Best, Magnus
probably not stupid but at least inconsistent. Of course you will always find people who are attracted by such watches. My question would be whether this is justification enough to produce them. And here it becomes interesting. If you look at companies like Patek Philippe you will find that they are very tight and stringent in terms of their product range. If you compare their collection with those of other manufacturers in the same league you'll identify several gaps although you could be sure
these jumping hours were suffuring some reliability problems. But they had a lot of charm with their thick main hand: Not sure it is a good idea when it overlaps the hours window but well, the watch was nice! This picture was published in 2001 on PuristSPro so it was created more than 10 years ago. Thanks Magnus for your post! Fx
amanico, I would say that clinging to outdated concept of mechanical military watch designs from the 1940s to 1960s is a modern fantasy and fallacy. As a tool, the military uses the best contemporary technology because, for them, it is not an aesthetic game but life or death. Hence, the development of horology has always served military goals of reliability, precision and accuracy; viz: Changing from pocket to Wrist-band watches to allow firing of naval guns and free hands for simultaneous calcu
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 10 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →