New Release
Amanico (Nicolas) introduces the Breitling Navitimer 1959 Re-Editions, showcasing the platinum, rose gold, and steel versions. His post delves into the escalating price points across the different metals, drawing parallels to similar trends seen with other luxury brands. Nicolas's initial impressions highlight the aesthetic appeal of these re-editions while expressing a preference for the original 1959 model.
The Seamaster 300 reference is a re-edition that draws inspiration from Omega's historical dive watches. It is characterized by its robust construction and design elements that pay homage to early professional timepieces, while incorporating modern watchmaking advancements. This reference is positioned as a contemporary interpretation for enthusiasts who appreciate vintage aesthetics combined with current performance standards.
This particular Seamaster 300 features a stainless steel case, typically measuring 41 mm in diameter. It is equipped with an automatic movement, often a Master Co-Axial caliber, providing a substantial power reserve. The watch is fitted with a domed sapphire crystal, contributing to its vintage appearance while offering enhanced scratch resistance. Its construction ensures a high degree of water resistance suitable for aquatic activities.
For collectors, this reference appeals to those seeking a blend of historical design and modern technical specifications. It represents Omega's commitment to its heritage while offering a reliable and well-engineered timepiece. The Seamaster 300 is a significant part of the brand's contemporary collection, offering a distinct alternative to other models within the Seamaster family.
Were not around in 1959!😜
This piece made me pay attention to the brand!
However, i find it a bit let down for only 30 meter WR for a 9000 USD sport/tool watch. I am pretty sure Breitling has capability to increase the WR up to 100 mtr even without screw down crown. IWC can do it, Seiko can do it. A bit lazy IMO.
Than a car driver touch the sea )
Breitling didn’t consider WR as a priority for pilot’s watches back then. I was reading the Hodinkee article on the water damage to Scott Carpenter’s Cosmonaute:
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 23 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
