Breitling Navitimer Ref. 806 1959 Re-Edition: A Collector's Perspective
Review

Breitling Navitimer Ref. 806 1959 Re-Edition: A Collector's Perspective

By saintseiyaikki · Jul 30, 2020 · 23 replies
saintseiyaikki
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
23 replies1971 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

In a world where 're-edition' can mean many things, saintseiyaikki's post on the Breitling Navitimer Ref. 806 1959 Re-Edition cuts through the noise, highlighting what makes a tribute truly exceptional. His initial impressions and accompanying photos underscore the meticulous attention to detail that sets this particular re-issue apart. This article synthesizes community insights, exploring why collectors value faithful reproductions like this one.

23 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Same case size; dial layout with a good proportion; the plexiglass; and the remarkable thickness (due to the modified hand winding movement) Well done, Breitling 🤝






This message has been edited by cazalea on 2020-07-30 10:25:02

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
DH
dhendolan
Jul 30, 2020
Absolutely brilliant!

Congratulations on a great watch. Wear it in good health.

SA
saintseiyaikki
Jul 30, 2020
Thanks for your kind words🍺 [nt]

AM
amanico
Jul 30, 2020
I would not call it replica, but homage. It is much less pejorative. [nt]

IN
India Whiskey Charlie
Jul 30, 2020
Or, a faithful re-issue 👍 [nt]

AM
amanico
Jul 30, 2020
Or a Tribute, indeed. [nt]

FA
FabR
Jul 30, 2020
That's right, "replica" in common watch speak is of course associated with fake, but I think also "homage" usually refers to third parties (and the line between the two terms is often blurred)...

I'm not a native speaker of English, but I also like "re-issue" (or "re-edition") best ;-)

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 23 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →