WPS member · Bulgari forum
27 replies4691 views5 photos
Chicolini initiates a compelling discussion on the Bulgari Octo Finissimo, asking the community to weigh in on their preference between the stainless steel and ceramic versions. This thread delves into the aesthetic and practical differences between these two distinct material choices for a watch celebrated for its ultra-thin design.
Stainless steel (photo courtesy of Monochrome watches)


Or
Key Points from the Discussion
- The ceramic Octo Finissimo offers a unique aesthetic and incredible lightness, making it a versatile option for different moods or outfits. Its water resistance is also a notable advantage.
- The stainless steel version can appear too bright or sterile to some, while the titanium version is praised for its daily wearability. A potential drawback of the steel is its rhodium plating for an ultra-white shine, and the micro-rotor's winding efficiency is questioned.
- The ceramic Octo Finissimo is described as a unique piece, with even the buckle made of ceramic, offering a range from 'full phantom' to legible. It's suggested as an excellent addition for a collection that already includes 'blingy' pieces like a Royal Oak, but not as a sole watch.
- Despite its perceived similarity to the Royal Oak, the Octo Finissimo has successfully established its own original and sharp design DNA, with the stainless steel iteration being a favorite for its brightness.
- The stainless steel version is considered too severe for the watch's size and bracelet, while the sandblasted ceramic's jet black finish might be too dark, as black cases often look better in a dark grey.
- One contributor expresses a clear preference against the black ceramic version after trying it on in person, finding it unappealing.
Advertisement
Continue the conversation
This thread is active on the Bulgari forum with 27 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →