
quattro's in-depth exploration of the Chopard L.U.C All-in-One offers a rare look at a highly complicated, two-sided timepiece. His detailed photographs and historical overview provide essential context for understanding Chopard's horological ambitions. This article delves into the community's nuanced reactions to the watch's impressive technical specifications versus its polarizing dimensions.



























Size, as in too big, is never an issue for me when it comes to watches. Some of us like knowing that we have something substantial on the wrist. 18mm thickness? 46mm case? Bring it on! Ha ha. Thanks for sharing such lovely pics too.
What a marvelous showcase of technical prowess, only to be deduced to something akin to a decorative item as a result of its unforgiving proportions.... Thank you very much for the excellent pictorial, cheers, Filip
Imagine a car that can do 0-100 kph in 3 seconds, has all of the superlative statistics. But! It isn't beautiful. That's this watch... It isn't beautiful. It checks all the boxes when it comes to complications, but it isn't aesthetically well done. The date is too small. That Tourbillon bridge is way too big and strangely proportioned. The Tesla Model 3 is very capable, fast, safe, and even handles well. Has terrible brakes though. But, it isn't beautiful!
It’s definitely substantial and, if one has the adequate wrist and body size and enjoys a big watch, it’s a piece to consider. Aesthetically, I like the second gen dial very much, especially the verdigris with a rose gold case. Best, Emmanuel
Too bad, indeed. Especially as I like the verdigris dial of the watch I was able to handle. These past two years, Chopard has started reducing the size of its watches. Hopefully the All-in-One will be put on a diet someday… Best, Emmanuel
but not on the All-in-One: I personally like the second gen dial… But regret the monstrous proportions… Best, Emmanuel
This thread is active on the Chopard forum with 12 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →