
KIH provides an exclusive first look at the new Chopard L.U.C XPS series, sharing live photos directly from the factory floor. This post offers a detailed visual tour of the platinum, rose gold, and white gold models, highlighting their design nuances and movement finishing, even before official reports were released.

























1. The applied markers remain the same size all around. 2. It is at the '3' position and doesn't interrupt the sub-second hand. Love the thinness. Great photos...thank you once again. m
The white gold model with no date is an ABSOLUTELY KILLER!cant wait to see it in stores
Thanks for the great photos!! Lovely pieces, for sure. Though for me, the original LUC 1860 with the caliber 1.96 is still the best LUC watch ever. I have never seen Geneva Seal stamped on a watch case - I thought it was stamped only on movements (such as the 1.96) which meet certain standards of quality/decoration, and which are assembled in Geneva. Anyone know what the Geneva case stamp means? Thanks, Gary
Personally, I prefer the L.U.C XPS Poinçon de Genève in platinum. The indexes aren't sharp.
Half Rose Gold and half White Gold will do nicely. And if KFS could just sign the boxes ... Cazalea
That's strange - don't like the case stamp unless it has a meaning with respect to the case itself. Geneva Seal and COSC, while both historic, appear to have increasingly less significance - the METAS Certification and Fleurier Cert seem to have more weight.
This thread is active on the Chopard forum with 48 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →