
Elliot55 initiates a thought-provoking discussion on the elusive concept of a 'grail watch,' questioning its definition and the emotional journey collectors undertake in its pursuit. Drawing parallels between the thrill of the hunt and the potential for post-acquisition disillusionment, this article invites readers to reflect on what truly constitutes a horological grail.

. . . should one actually be attained, and another take its place, then the original wasn't really a grail at all. There are many facets to this discussion, and I look forward to reading them. For what it's worth, my grail has been the blue central tourbillon . . . . . . from Omega ever since first seeing an image of it when I started collecting fifteen years ago. Cordially, Art
... Will it still be a "Grail" when you finally own one? Curious, - Scott
. . . as of now, yes. There hasn't been a watch that's come down the pike which even for a moment had me reconsidering my affection for the blue gold dial central tourbillon. Art
I agree with Art. There has to be a sense of fulfillment and completion. The circle is closed. Otherwise it would seem that you are covetous of acquisitions. -Joe
as I am not a collector by any stretch of the imagination. I'd like to play with lists, targeting a piece, enjoying it, revisiting that list and so and so forth. If I can realistically dream about it, it's not a Grail. My "Grail" from a discussion perspective would be a GP laureato sapphire three bridges. I think there's a Purist who owns one and when he posted it I thought to myself.. Well that's not much of a Grail after all (even thought I don't have the money for it) and rained on my parade
... Ir the circle is closed, does that mean there is never another acquisition to be had? - Scott
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 39 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →