Jaeger-LeCoultre: Musings on Innovation and Technical Mastery
Discussion

Jaeger-LeCoultre: Musings on Innovation and Technical Mastery

By K-Lo · Apr 25, 2020 · 29 replies
K-Lo
WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum
29 replies2317 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 ✉ 🔗

K-Lo's thought-provoking post from 2020 delves into the expectations collectors hold for Jaeger-LeCoultre, particularly regarding innovation and technical mastery. His 'musings' challenge the Maison to deliver more than incremental changes, advocating for a spirit of revolution in horological advancement. This article synthesizes community reactions to K-Lo's call for JLC to push boundaries, especially in a challenging market landscape.

29 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

As we await more treasures from the Maison, likely (more than probably), it has determined what is in store for the rest of the year.

As complicated things go: machines; gadgets, and the like - they have to be planned, R&Ded, tested, and put into action. If not more than that.

Maybe this musing is for next year, or later, maybe it disappears into thin air, only time will tell. After all, it is just a musing.

In an evolution, not a revolution, I do think I have come to expect watches that change, in time, to have (1) cleaner dial designs or (2) longer power reserves or (3) even a new combination of features in product lines not seen hitherto. This expectation should come with the lay of the land in any horological improvement, if you will.

But technically, I expect “technical” masterpieces from the Maison. If to be believed, Miriam Webster, under 1(a), defines “technical” as “having special and usually practical knowledge especially of a mechanical or scientific subject.” See https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/technical, definition 1(a).

Maybe I am wrong, but I have yet to see any improvement or evolution of “practical knowledge especially of a mechanical or scientific subject” in relation to horology yesterday.

I understand that revolution is a big step, but maybe I just wished for something closer to revolution than obviousness or extreme “cautioned ” motion. (Emphasis added).

With all do respect,

Ted




Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AM
amanico
Apr 25, 2020
The problem is the crisis we are living. Do you really think it is the time to unveil something in this vein? [nt]

K-
K-Lo
Apr 25, 2020
I understand that perspective, at least I think,

Maybe there could have been a design that could be shared, and eventually, maybe, “tested” out for the balance of the year. Didn’t it take the Maison many years to produce, serially, the Extreme Lab 2? After it was announced. I guess I wanted more inspiration, something to “dream” of. I will admit, I was one of those kids who had a Ferrari poster on my wall, but I knew I would never get one. But I did like to dream. No disrespect, just a musing Dear Sire.

AM
amanico
Apr 25, 2020
There are some huge, gigantic projects, but I think it would be pure madness to introduce right now. And last year, we had two real monsters, with the MGT PC MR Auto and the Gyro Five! [nt]

No message body

K-
K-Lo
Apr 25, 2020
Thank you, I look forward to seeing

Those huge, gigantic projects.

CO
cory
Apr 26, 2020
What defines huge Nico? Are we talking Gyro 5 scale? [nt]

CO
cory
Apr 26, 2020
That's exciting. [nt]

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 29 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →