Jaeger-LeCoultre's Brand Ambassadors: Marketing vs. Horological Substance
Discussion

Jaeger-LeCoultre's Brand Ambassadors: Marketing vs. Horological Substance

By vitalsigns · Apr 27, 2023 · 78 replies
vitalsigns
WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum
78 replies7389 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

In a thought-provoking post, vitalsigns initiates a crucial discussion on the efficacy of brand ambassadors in the luxury watch industry, specifically scrutinizing Jaeger-LeCoultre's partnership with Lenny Kravitz. He challenges the prevailing marketing strategies that prioritize celebrity influence over product innovation, urging a re-evaluation of what truly resonates with the collector base. This article synthesizes community insights into the complex balance between marketing ROI and horological substance.

I'm personally not a fan of brand ambassadors in general. I don't need celebrity influence to help convince me to buy a timepiece.

Coming on the heels of allegations of product stagnation, JLC pursues the usual path, that path seemingly being: ROI on marketing > ROI on product.

Of course, it needn't be, and never is, only one or the other. Marketing is good and important (a brand has to market even good products, after all). But too much marketing and too little new and interesting products is not good in the eyes of the collector base.

I'm mostly agnostic on Kravitz...in isolation, I don't see his association as either good or bad in any significant way...in fact, on reflection, perhaps it's even good from a marketing/brand perspective. A bit outside the mainstream without an overly risky association.






Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AU
AuHavrePro
Apr 27, 2023

And I like Lenny Kravitz just fine!....

VI
vitalsigns
Apr 27, 2023

Well, maybe not for you, but for us average folks

CO
CoolK
Apr 27, 2023

However it’s a company that needs to make profit by expanding their clientele constantly and not all of its customers are horology aficionados like us (if I may call us that). Marketing and brand ambassadors are based on their data crunching of their customer pool base - where they come from, demographics, reasons for buying a watch, user surveys. There are far too many people in the world that buy things just because a celebrity has it.

J.
j.jota
Apr 27, 2023

In their daily lives… I don’t think Lenny Kravitz is a ‘JLC’ kind of guy, but I could be wrong. Jay-Z wears Reverso, but hardly think he’d want to rep the brand.

RA
RabidManatee
Apr 27, 2023

unless it’s Geddy 😉. Seriously, I’m not a fan of celebrity brand ambassadors. I think they smack of branding desperation. Am I cool because of what I wear? No! What I wear is cool because I’m the guy wearing it!

CH
ChristianDK
Apr 27, 2023

I’m sure some consultants can explain that irs a great idea but it doesn’t make any difference or impression. As brand ambassadors never do do. We as consumers know full well that it’s all a money thing`and nothing else. My only exception would have been been Lemmy but that is sadly too late.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 78 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →