Vintage
Bruno.M1 shares his excitement about acquiring a Longines Lindbergh 'replica' from 1987, a limited edition piece that faithfully recreates the original's 47mm size and manual-wind movement. His post delves into the nuances of this historical reissue, sparking a community discussion about its authenticity and technical details, particularly regarding the dial material and movement origins.
This one was quite some time on my wishlist.
Today not my favorite brand but in the past the made some Jewels. Think about their sought after chronographs like the 13 ZN and 30 CH. A 30CH was something I found months ago , mission succeeded LOL. The other one on the wishlist was not a 13 ZN, a 30 CH was good enough. That doesn't mean I would not add a 13 ZN if I find the perfect watch for a good price 
Enough about chronographs.
Another watch (from Longines if you didn't know yet) is the 47 mm Weems or Lindbergh. Looking for one since years and saw a vintage from the 1930's - 1940's about 1 year ago. When I met Ubik ( together with Imran) in London. His Weems was a great piece. But when I saw the prices I gave up that watch.
Other possibilities were a more recent Weems or Lindbergh but it had to be a 47 mm and ALL of them were using automatic ETA movements. Nice movements but I do prefer a manual wind and definitely for that watch. 70 Years ago they used a specific pocket watch movement ( inhouse Longines) and that is much cooler LOL
Untill I discovered that limited edition they made in 1987. In 1927 the Lindbergh was invented and 60 years later they made that special edition .... WITH the same movement. So not the vintage piece from 70 years ago but one from 1987 with a similar movement. Being 26 years old it's a semi vintage
So the hunt started... and finished today
Here are some pics
Know that the dial is white but because of reflections it seems to be blue
This is why I said in the title ' I bought a REPLICA'
wtf, couldn't they call it a homage ? I guess only 'fake' could have been worse LOL
the movement ... not that stupid automatic ETA )))
And now some questions ... if somebody has answer, please reply
1/ is the white part of the dial enamel ?
According John Goldberger his book ' Longines watches' this LE from 1987 has an enamel dial. But I have doubts, I thought only these from the 1930's were in enamel
2/ That pocket watch movement ... is it old stock they still had in 1987 or is it a pocket movement which is - or still was - in production at that time ?
Don't know much about this "Replica", at least they are accurate to use that...Seems to me to be a pretty accurate replica of the original. Although I'm sure the white section is not true enamel. Still lovely though! rep·li·ca [ rep -li-k uh ] Show IPA noun 1. a copy or reproduction of a work of art produced by the maker of the original or under his or her supervision. 2. any close or exact copy or reproduction. Origin: 1815–25; < Italian: reply, repetition, derivative of replicare to repeat
... but the best. Congratulations, Bruno on a nice find. It looks to me like this was the first of the Lindbergh re-editions for the 60th anniversary. And the most original, with the subsequent ones coming in different sizes and with various modern movements. It looks like there was a limited edition of 100 in YG at the same time and this was said to have a MOP dial. Let us know what else you find out. Regards Andrew
that was indeed the first one, that was the one I was looking for :-) they made indeed 100 in gold and I think there was also a 37 mm with automatic Lémania movement, that last one was not limited. I found a few of these 37 mm with automatic movement and they are MUCH cheaper. So the small 37 was easier to find and only a fraction of the price but I wanted the big one, the one with manual movement as it should be. On the other hand, I might as well add a 37 with that automatic movement because s
Well as said, I have doubts too But it does look like it is a lacquered dial ... or enamel ? This is what I found in the big Longines book ... but I'm still not sure, it wouldn't be the first mistake in a book
Congrats, and what a watch. I would prefer this over the original, to be frank. Best, Horo
I don't know but it looks like it could be the way the numbers are painted it looks like enamel but please correct me if i'm wrong
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 9 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
