Discussion
Miranda's provocative post challenges the prevailing narrative surrounding a recent luxury watch release, sparking a robust discussion among WatchProSite's discerning collectors. Her critique of 'fake journalism' and 'bitter disappointment' among seasoned enthusiasts sets the stage for a deep dive into the aesthetic, horological, and market implications of this new direction. This article synthesizes the community's diverse reactions, offering a multi-faceted perspective on a significant moment in contemporary watchmaking.
Nobody pays for media anymore, so it's hard to do much other than promote brands. Better than no media at all.
I does seem a little out of left field for GQ to highlight this brand, unless it’s true.
Urban Jürgensen timepieces represent the pinnacle of horological artistry, blending centuries-old craftsmanship with modern precision. Each watch is a masterpiece, meticulously handcrafted with an unwavering dedication to excellence. The brand’s signature details—like the thermally blued hands, exquisite guilloché dials, and impeccably finished movements—are a testament to its deep heritage and uncompromising standards. What truly sets Urban Jürgensen apart is its ability to marry elegance with
just because u don't like it, does not make it less legit. this world can use a little let it go now 😅
GQ is known to publish inaccurate reports and articles that contain a lot of fabrications. They are mostly click bait.
it's a different target audience. perhaps they're just trying to make a living?
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 55 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
