
AndrewD initiates a comprehensive thread dedicated to the Omega Dynamic line, inviting collectors to share their pieces and insights. This article explores the ergonomic design philosophy behind the Dynamic, its historical context, and the diverse variants produced from 1967 into the late 1970s.
Hi All,
With the recent Dynamic discussions (and my new acquisition!) I thought it would be fun to bring together as many Dynamics in the one thread as possible.
The Dynamic line was introduced in 1967 and the elliptical case and tapering strap were designed “especially for the human wrist” to fold around the ulnar styloid process. While the idea of ergonomic design, to allow humans to better (and more safely) interact with their surroundings and equipment, has been with us for a long time, the term “ergonomics” is attributed to Psychologist Hywel Murrell in 1949. The idea really took off in popular design in the 1960’s and the Dynamic grew out of this movement and also reflects the aesthetic sensibilities of the period. Omega produced Dynamics into the late 1970’s and there were many different variants over that period.
Looking forward to seeing your Dynamics …
Andrew

I've had a number over the years but my favourite is the bullseye in case 166.0039, seen below, which is now the only one I have in my collection. Amazing, but after 30 odd years these watches still look contemporary and IMO are under-valued. I did an essay some time ago on all the Dynamic models click here Cheers Desmond
Thanks Desmond, very useful review, particularly the Table at the end. I can see why you retained the "Bulls-Eye" Dynamic. Great example. Regards Andrew
We share one of the same favorites Desmond... I also really like the split in the dial on the Bulls-eye. Another favorite would be the racing dial. I am on my phone right now, but is yours a gold model..? I have read your article, really good stuff. Only to be recommended. Goodonyou Desmond Cheers Hans
No message body
Just a completely different build ;-) Dynamic Chrono from the 90s This message has been edited by mrsnak on 2010-07-31 15:23:56
Pardon my ignorance, Snak, but does this Dynamic fit into a lineage of military Omegas or is there a relation to the (aero)Dynamic range? And does the arrow on the chronograph second hand serve a purpose, or is it a design flourish? Nice use of colors and fonts from Omega. Andrew
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 22 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →