Omega Master Chronometer METAS Certification Guide
Complications

Omega Master Chronometer METAS Certification Guide

By nilomis · Feb 27, 2017 · 7 replies
nilomis
WPS member · Omega forum
7 replies3415 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Team, When, in 2014, Omega made an announcement about a new watch certification process, I confess that I took this just as another marketing gimmick. I continued with this impression until, in January 2017, I paid a visit to the Omega factories and saw the complete certification process. I was wron

7 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Team,

When, in 2014, Omega made an announcement about a new watch certification process, I confess that I took this just as another marketing gimmick.

I continued with this impression until, in January 2017, I paid a visit to the Omega factories and saw the complete certification process.

I was wrong, completely wrong and let's see this process in detail.

The C.O.S.C. Process

Before we dive to this master certification process, let's go back to the traditional C.O.S.C. (Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres) process.

To obtain a C.O.S.C. chronometer certificate (I'm quoting from Wikipedia, the C.O.S.C. site is in French) one of the steps are:

"Each uncased movement is individually tested for fifteen days, in five positions, at three different temperatures. The movements are fitted with a seconds hand and the automatic winding mechanisms are disengaged for the tests. ".

This means that only the movement is tested not the complete watch.

Of course, this certification is useful to "debug" the movements and that's the main reason why Omega continue to send movement to be C.O.S.C. certified along with the fact that this certification allows the use of the word "Chronometer" on the watch dial.

A mechanical watch goes to the following tests:
(All times in seconds/day)

  1. Average daily rate: −4/+6
  2. Mean variation in rates: 2
  3. Greatest variation in rates: 5
  4. Difference between rates in H & V positions: −6/+8
  5. Largest variation in rates: 10
  6. Thermal variation: ±0.6
  7. Rate resumption: ±5

Some comments about this process:

1) Only the movement is certified.
2) Once the certified movement returns to the watch factory, that's the final assembly proceeds.
3) From my personal experience, a movement may be running perfectly and once is put into the case, variations can occurs.

The Master Chronometer / METAS Certification



Here we have a much more stringent testing that's a result of a partnering between Omega and the Swiss Federal Office of Metrology (METAS).

The tests includes:
The complete watch (bar the strap/bracelet) enters the certification "assembly line". This means that, once certified, no one will touch the movement.
In addition to those tests, the results of each watch is posted on a Web site, where the owner can access the test results.

This site can be accessed by: https: (login required)

Here's the test results from one of my watches:

Type of test Results Test limits
FUNCTION OF COSC-APPROVED MOVEMENT DURING EXPOSURE TO 15,000 GAUSS (1.5 Tesla) MAGNETIC FIELD passed 15,000 gauss
FUNCTION OF WATCH DURING EXPOSURE TO 15,000 GAUSS MAGNETIC FIELD passed 15,000 gauss
DEVIATION OF DAILY CHRONOMETRIC PRECISION AFTER EXPOSURE TO 15,000 GAUSS 0,2 sec / day 0 to 5 sec/day
AVERAGE DAILY CHRONOMETRIC PRECISION OF THE WATCH 1,8 sec / day 0 to 5 sec/day
POWER RESERVE passed 60 hours
DEVIATION OF CHRONOMETRIC PRECISION IN SIX POSITIONS 2,5 sec / day 0 to 12 sec/day
DEVIATION OF CHRONOMETRIC PRECISION BETWEEN 100% and 33% OF POWER RESERVE 1,3 sec / day 0 to 8 sec/day
WATER RESISTANCE passed 60 bar (600 m/2000 ft)

Before someone asks, here's the watch:



Not bad, for a diver chronograph.


Conclusions

When I got an Omega Master Chronometer watch, the first thing that I do is to scan the Master Chronometer card (an App is available - Search for "Omega Scanner" on the App store) and see the results.

Those results, contrary to the C.O.S.C ones, gives to me a true expectation of the watch performance and makes me comfortable that all parameters are correct.

Kudos to Omega for doing a true full disclosure about their products and assuring us that what we got was truly tested.

Thanks for reading.

Cheers,

Nilo









Advertisement
The Discussion
AM
amanico
Feb 27, 2017

Is the test under 15000 Gauss proper to Omega? I was quite surprised to read that. I understand the interest of submitting an encased movement to some Gauss, but up to 15000? Best, Nicolas

NI
nilomis
Feb 27, 2017

Practical magnetic field that was possible to produce. All Master Chronometer watches, theoretically, don\'t have any magnetic sensitivity. Cheers, Nilo

JO
john c
Feb 27, 2017

What an interesting article. Just proved another reason why l love Omega. Cheers, John.

NI
nilomis
Feb 27, 2017

Omega deserves much more respect (She was with me during the visit). Cheers, Nilo

PO
Poky
Feb 27, 2017

I work with such magnets and there is all sorts of safety with regards to human implants and what you carry on you. My total respect to Omega, such an understated brand yet with so much to offer both in terms of aesthetic and function.

BE
BentN
Feb 27, 2017

My current watch interest is in the state of "decade-low" and I don't care too much what's on the wrist these days as long as it's mechanical and practical, BUT I have a slow awakening appreciation for the new Speedmaster Master Co Axial Moonphase. Your post and info made me appreciate the technical achievement behind these Omega pieces even more. Lets see what the year will bring Many many thanks, All best 2017 Bent

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Omega forum with 7 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →