Vintage
Amanico, a seasoned collector, shares his journey to acquire a vintage Omega Seamaster 300 Ref. 14755, a piece he considers a perfect complement to his 1964 SM 300. His detailed comparison of the two references, alongside his reflections on other vintage Omega diving watches, offers valuable insights into the nuances of collecting these iconic timepieces. This post highlights the discerning eye required to appreciate the subtle yet significant differences between vintage references.
The Omega CK2998 is a chronograph model recognized for its robust design and functional aesthetic. It belongs to a lineage of chronographs that established a distinct visual identity for the brand, characterized by a clear and legible dial layout. This reference is notable for its early adoption of a tachymeter scale on the bezel, a feature that would become a hallmark of many subsequent sports chronographs.
This reference features a 39 mm stainless steel case, housing the manual-winding Caliber 321. This movement provides a power reserve of 45 hours. The watch is fitted with a Hesalite crystal and offers a water resistance of 60 meters. The fixed tachymeter bezel is a key design element, framing a black dial.
The CK2998 holds interest for collectors seeking early examples of Omega's chronograph development. Its design elements, including the case proportions and dial configuration, represent a significant period in the brand's history. The presence of the Caliber 321 further enhances its appeal among enthusiasts of vintage chronograph movements.
I think the SM300s from the late 50s to the late 60s are relative bargains. They are good looking, have a real history and are perfectly suitable as a daily wearer. The RM and the straight lug speedmasters are certainly worthy targets. If I might add a third watch to target - the Omega RAF '53 watch with the thin arrow dial - a very uncommon watch with the TA dial and made for only a year by omega and served as the predecessor of the railmaster. Mike
....and more overall appeal with that thin bezel. Makes the face look very open. The big crown is very attractive, and the watch looks to be in great condition. As an aside, I really appreciate posts like these. They open up beautiful corners of the vintage universe with details and photographs that are impossible to find anywhere else. And the compare/contrast to the FF and Rolex of the era is very apt. -Tom
congratulations! Your choice was excellent, and I love the hands as well. Best regards, Tony
hi Nico, I think you made the right decision, if i were you, i would also make the same choice. this watch gives a more unique look with dial, bezel, hands etc than the classical one. looking at your new catch, i am sure i will get one omega diver sooner or later. anyway, collecting vintage and modern watches are equally fascinating and exciting, our life will be full of fun! cheers, my friend. stefan
And I agree even more if you compare the first or the following generation ( my 14 755 ) with the Rolex Subs direct competitors ,like the 5508 / 6536, not to speak of the 6538! These first SM 300 bring a lot of pleasure, indeed! As for the RAF '53, no idea of what you're speaking about.... Any pic? Best, and thanks again, Mike. Nicolas
If I was lucky enough to own a Rolex 5508, the pic would be terrific! There are some watches which surprise me when I know that they only are 39 mm. This SM 300 belongs to this category. It looks like the case is a good 40 mm. Thanks for your nice words. Best, Nicolas
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 53 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
