
K-Lo's original post sparked a vital discussion on the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M in Bronze Gold, a reference that pushes boundaries in material science and pricing strategy. This article delves into the community's initial reactions and expert analyses, offering a timely perspective on Omega's innovative use of its proprietary Bronze Gold alloy and its market positioning. Understanding collector sentiment around novel materials and value propositions remains crucial for enthusiasts and the industry alike.
Looking cool though. Thanks for sharing.
it’s very attractive , but have to say that price is step for that watch. I’ll be sticking with my NTTD.
I really like the direction Omega is going with these Seamasters! My favourite still remains the green/BG on a bracelet. Not sure about the price justification for the bracelet (especially when compared with the rubber strap version).
and it has a total gold value of $9 235 (at total product weight of 183g). It's not gold, really, because it's only 9k. Omega says it has palladium but one would wonder the percentage—Pd is a valuable metal, but the quantity matters. Anyway, compared to a solid Sedna Seamaster on rubber, the gold value there is $12 100 (product weighs 150g but deducted 30g for rubber strap, being generous). So at least in terms of raw material, the solid Seamaster is the better buy relative to the mesh bracelet.
. . . later today. Photos and comments of the latest arrivals tomorrow.
. . . of all the latest models the LA Omega boutique had on hand yesterday. Art
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →