Omega Vintage 1949 Ultra-Light Comparison
Vintage

Omega Vintage 1949 Ultra-Light Comparison

By keks · Sep 7, 2019 · 21 replies
keks
WPS member · Omega forum
21 replies1940 views1 photos
f š• in šŸ’¬ āœ‰ šŸ”—

Interesting to know what the rationale and decision making process at Omega was for the latest Aqua Terra pricing strategy. It is a cool piece but will be interesting to follow how it pans out. Non limited is smart as there will be less excess supply and information on production figures I suppose..

21 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Interesting to know what the rationale and decision making process at Omega was for the latest Aqua Terra pricing strategy. It is a cool piece but will be interesting to follow how it pans out. Non limited is smart as there will be less excess supply and information on production figures I suppose... 55 grams is light by modern standards so thought I’d take my 70 year old Omega to the scale... 40 grams including a rather thick and heavy leather strap! Now that is ultra light! Yes not a fair comparison but fun exercise nevertheless.

They sure knew how to make quality pieces in 1949... runs perfectly well even now:





Advertisement
The Discussion
CP
Cpt Scarlet
Sep 7, 2019
The beauty of vintage Omega ! [nt]

SE
Seeks
Sep 7, 2019
40grams of historical beauty!

well done !šŸ‘ best regards

KE
keks
Sep 7, 2019
yes a challenger

to the notion of what is ultra light...

AM
amanico
Sep 7, 2019
for the price of this modern piece, you can get a CK 2913, a CK 2914 and you can start to save for a Speedmaster straight lugs.. [nt]

KE
keks
Sep 7, 2019
choices

choices.... perhaps the idea is to create a reference that only will be sold in very very limited numbers... one in each color perhaps... like a marketing ploy

DH
dhendolan
Sep 7, 2019
Yours is more beautiful

In my opinion. Nice watch!

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Omega forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →