
Centurionone's inquiry into Omega's choice of Grade 2 titanium for the Seamaster Diver 300M 'No Time To Die' (NTTD) edition sparked a fascinating discussion among collectors. This article delves into the community's insights, exploring the technical, aesthetic, and practical implications of titanium grades in luxury watchmaking. Centurionone's initial question serves as a springboard for a deeper understanding of material science in horology.

Now, with omega’s sister company (Blancpain) issuing a watch in aeronautical/surgical grade 23 titanium, I’ll just wait until omega brings it on on a watch that lacks fauxtina
The bracelet is not as flexible/ malleable as usual metal bracelet. Besides, the folding clasp is also bulkier than I anticipated.
Why should we think that a watch is a more serious tool if it's got a hardened surface that prevents it from getting surface scratches? If you think of a watch as being a serious tool, you'd be interested in whether it keeps functioning after it's banged around, but I don't see why you'd care whether it looks scuffed up or not. In other words, I want to invert your question: if you want it to be an action watch rather than a prop, why are you asking about resistance to dings and scratches?
Pretty disappointing because it was the best feeling mesh bracelet I'd ever handled!
The titanium ploprof I have is grade 5 titanium. Interesting to know what is behind the decision on the grade.
It’s excellent if you are applying a brushed finish and the finished shade of the metal is subtly different. But consider this … The Omega X33 is also made from Grade 2 titanium and has been independently tested by both NASA and ESA to extremes. If it’s tough enough for them it’s tough enough for us.
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 41 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →