Discussion
Lankysudanese's original post challenges the prevailing narrative in luxury watches by making a compelling case for Omega's current offerings. Prompted by personal experiences with Rolex servicing and a perceived dismissal of Omega, Lankysudanese meticulously details how Omega's catalogue, from materials to complications and chronometry, presents a formidable argument for its superiority. This article explores the community's response to his detailed comparison, highlighting key insights into Omega's evolution and market position.
That is gonna make my accountant happy
...(including the controversial ‘value for money’ metric)
Add the ultra ridiculous price into the equation and you have a cheap looking expensive watch.
But the point is bigger than Rolex alone...while I think Omega is undervalued (but catching up VERY quickly) it is galling when certain (not Rolex actually) brands get away with sub standard products with excuses like”they are hand made”, “don’t look to close” or “what’s the big deal?”...the whole point of the price premium IS the quality!! Customers absolutely should hold these brands accountable for any flaws that can be observed without a microscope ie. If you see it through a lupe so can / s
Great value at just $5 ;-))
Of all the top tier brands brands; they are the only one to not offer exhibition backs. They don’t do the exotic finishing that we have come to expect from fine watchmakers!
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 34 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
