
ArmisT initiates a compelling discussion on the Panerai PAM 587, a model widely celebrated for its historical fidelity. While acknowledging its significance within Panerai's lineage, ArmisT candidly explores his personal wrist experience and evolving preferences, particularly in comparison to other references like the PAM 995. This article delves into the nuances of collector perception, where a watch's historical accuracy meets individual wearability and aesthetic appreciation.

so sue me
That is sincerely high praise coming from you. Like you, I’m now partial to the 44mm models in general.
Singularly elegant and rugged at the same time.
The 47mm radiomir case (1940) doesn’t work for me like a 47mm luminor case does. I didn’t realize this before getting, and the 673 seemed redundant with my 372. So, when i go 47mm, then 372 is the go to, despite wanting to enjoy wearing 587. But you can’t force it, and 995 has since fulfilled the Radiomir void.
This thread is active on the Officine Panerai forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →