Discussion
Pplater challenges the WatchProSite community with a 'California bar exam' on the Panerai PAM249 "California" dial, inviting a detailed discussion on its unique blend of old and modern design elements. The original author's prompt focuses specifically on the hour hand's interrupted luminescent fill, encouraging readers to dissect its aesthetic and historical implications. This post serves as an excellent platform for collectors to share their expertise and debate the nuances of this iconic Panerai reference.
"The design of the PAM249 "California" involves a quirky mix of elements, both old and modern, which come together surprisingly well to achieve a very appealing aesthetic. Although deceptively simple, it is apparent that much thought has gone into the scale and dimension of each design element present (and absent). The most thoughtful design element apparent on the face of the watch is the bar across the hour hand".
Discuss this statement, examining the positive or negative view. Answers should be less than three thousand words. Time: 3 hours. Text books, calculators and other materials permitted.
Cheers,
Prof. pplater.
The PAM00249 represents Panerai's Radiomir 1936 SE series, a special edition reference produced from 2007 to 2012. This 47mm stainless steel model features the manual-winding P.3000 caliber and maintains the fundamental characteristics of the Radiomir collection within a limited production timeframe.
The watch houses a black dial within a 47mm stainless steel case topped with sapphire crystal and a smooth bezel configuration. The manual-winding P.3000 movement provides a 72-hour power reserve. Water resistance reaches 100 meters, and the watch is fitted with a leather strap. The substantial case size aligns with Panerai's sizing approach during this production period.
This reference appeals to collectors focused on Panerai's mid-2000s special edition offerings and those seeking manual-winding complications within the Radiomir lineup. The five-year production window from 2007 to 2012 positions the PAM249 as a time-specific variant that bridges Panerai's modern manufacturing era with traditional hand-wound movement architecture.
It's not about an esthetic choice, but about the Respect of the original and historical model. An evidence? ( Don't remember who to credit, maybe ..MT? ). The Cali is one of these very nice Panerai, and the respect of the original model is part of its beauty. So yes, this hand is particular, but it existed and is exactly the same than the one on the 3646... So, not only you will give up the charges against Panerai, your Honor, but you will also make some public apologizes! LOLOLOLOLOL Best, my f
Counsel has failed to familiarise himself with his brief. Note the original proposition; '... The design of the PAM249 "California" involves a quirky mix of elements, both old and modern..." Counsel will answer the question without further obfuscation - after serving 24 hours on 'Help Desk' for contempt! ;-) Cheers, pplater.
LOL I only see old elements. Where are the new? LOL Best, Your Honor. Nicolas This message has been edited by amanico on 2008-12-07 00:25:52
...the lugs on a 3646 without a fretsaw. Next question? Cheers, pplater.
As you said: Quirky... Is an useful improvement to be considered as Quirky? Let me quote the Case: Panerai vs Amanico, High Court of Justice September the 22d, 2006. LMAO. Best. Nicolas
"Is an useful improvement to be considered as Quirky" Like, for example, Homo sapiens standing erect, with a skeleton designed for 'four wheel drive'??? Nature -v- Amanico , High Court of Opinion, 7 December 2008. !!!!!!!! Cheers, pplater.
This thread is active on the Officine Panerai forum with 20 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
