Patek 5204P vs. Lange 1815 Rattrapante Perpetual

p.boxster · 2017-06-30T09:48:26Z

Direct comparison: Patek Philippe 5204P vs. A. Lange & Söhne 1815 Rattrapante Perpetual. Platinum versions, movement complexity, dial aesthetics, and wearability.

p.boxster

WPS member · Patek Philippe forum

20 replies7609 views0 photos

After acquiring the 1815 Rattrapante, I just had the once-in-a-lifetime-opportunity the compare it directly with it`s pendant: The Patek 5204P. The clash Both the Platinum Versions, these versions are the ones I like most of each watch. The most impressive aspect of the Patek is it´s size, height an

20 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

After acquiring the 1815 Rattrapante, I just had the once-in-a-lifetime-opportunity the compare it directly with it`s pendant: The Patek 5204P. The clash

Both the Platinum Versions, these versions are the ones I like most of each watch. The most impressive aspect of the Patek is it´s size, height and legibility considering the massive complexity. The Lange is just more massive in every case. BUT the Lange is still a very wearable watch even on my small wrist. And it´s very legible too. I like the busy-ness of the dial in such a complex watch. A big advantage on the Lange: The moon phase is much nicer than on the Patek. You can even see the milky way in the stars...

The movements are equally beautiful, each in it´s own way.

Comparing the complexity and features, one must admit that the Patek is even more complex: it has an instantaneous minute counter - the Lange doesn`t (in this watch; the Double Split and the Datograph have). Furthermore the Patek has an isolator-mechanism for the rattrapante-second - the Lange doesn´t (only the Double Split has the double isolator). For practical use, this is not relevant, but the complexity of the Patek 5204 is just a bit higher (as the price is).

In the whole experience, the Lange is just more impressive than the Patek! Both have the "wow"-factor, but for me the Lange has it more - simply stunning!

Despite, both watches are even kind of discreet in the white metal; can easily be worn without looking up too much...

It was a pleasure to have the opportunity to see them both!!

About the Patek Philippe Split-Seconds Chronograph Perpetual Calendar Ref. 5204

Patek Philippe Reference 5204 Split-Seconds Chronograph Perpetual Calendar

The Reference 5204 combines split-seconds chronograph functionality with perpetual calendar complications in a 40mm case format. This reference represents Patek Philippe's approach to integrating dual chronograph timing capabilities with complete calendar functions, positioning it as a grand complication within the manufacture's lineup.

The 40mm case is available in 18k white gold or rose gold with polished bezel treatment and sapphire crystal. The manual-winding Caliber R CH 27 PS QI provides 48 hours of power reserve. Dial options include silvery-gray or silvery-opaline finishes, paired with alligator leather straps. Water resistance is rated to 30 meters.

Produced from 2012 to 2019, the 5204 appeals to collectors seeking complications beyond standard chronographs or simple perpetual calendars. The split-seconds function adds timing versatility while maintaining the traditional manual-winding operation characteristic of high-end chronograph manufacture. The reference serves collectors prioritizing mechanical complexity and dual precious metal case options.

Specifications

Caliber: R CH 27 PS QI

Case: 18k White Gold or Rose Gold

Diameter: 40 mm

Dial: Silvery-gray or Silvery-opaline

Water Resist.: 30m

Crystal: Sapphire

The Discussion

Clueless_Collector

Jun 30, 2017

Of course, both are nice and either one is more than good enough....same post, 5 month's ago? A review of the Clash, who wins now? [nt]

p.boxster

Jun 30, 2017

Who wins is your decision...

... and I dont think it changes in 5 months, does it? Post was in Lange section, thought it might interest the Patek readers too...

Clueless_Collector

Jun 30, 2017

Emotionally, I feel for Lange, but logically Patek wins in this scenario...

especially when I know I will lose ~50% from new when I need to sell or trade. Maybe someday Lange will gain more recognition from a broader base of fans and will be sought after by majority, it will be a different story. Also, from my observation here in this platform, you will have most readers in Patek > Rolex >> Lange. Therefore, maybe this kind of comparison post can be in HoMe or the mods can create a new category eg. Watches 1-2-1, 1:1, Head to Head etc, No real winner, just personal pref

Alkiro1

Jun 30, 2017

It's a little bit like trying to choose between his mother and father 🤔. Really a matter of taste for me

Best wishes Alkiro

Ray8080

Jun 30, 2017

Borh are awesome! It is easier to read the month and day on the 5204P, but I think I would prefer the 1815 Rattrapante [nt]

sham1

Jun 30, 2017

This is actually a lot simpler than it looks :-)

The Lange for me triumphs in the following areas: 1. The moonphase looks a lot better than the unconventional upside down moonphase of the Patek. 2. I love the Arabic numerals on the Lange compared to the less exciting baton markers on the Patek. 3. The Lange has a useful power reserve feature which the Patek does not. I say useful because both watches are manual winding perpetual calendars so it is vital that the watch has been wound sufficiently to ensure that the perpetual calendar does not r