Patek Philippe 5327R Perpetual Calendar Hands-On
Review

Patek Philippe 5327R Perpetual Calendar Hands-On

By Mark in Paris · Apr 28, 2016 · 32 replies
Mark in Paris
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
32 replies19481 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Mark in Paris offers an early look at the Patek Philippe Ref. 5327R Perpetual Calendar, a significant Baselworld 2016 novelty. He emphasizes the importance of seeing new references in person to truly appreciate their design and how they fit within the brand's legacy, particularly comparing it to previous perpetual calendar generations.

32 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Hi everyone,

I could handle several of Baselworld 2016's novelties lately and I will prepare some reviews for later in the year but I will try to select a few pictures showing what the watches are about.

When we are flooded during two weeks with hundreds of pictures on the net, mixing everything and having sometimes a very quick look at them, it is difficult to judge what they bring and what they would communicate from an owner perspective and regarding the brand's history. We'll have the whole year to think about them and see them in the metal. This last point is mandatory to judge them accurately and I hope that the feedback we have here and that I'll try to give will help people who don't have easily access to them.

I'll start with a reference I like a lot (my favorite with the 5204R and the two new WT refeences to be frank).

I already told you how much I think the 5227 case is a work of art and that it was natural that the case was used for the new Perpetual Calendar generation.

Believe me, the result is breathtaking, very elegant and refined in the metal. It brings a little more modernity from the last 3940 and 5140 generations . Furthermore, the Breguet numerals are maybe the reference on which it works the best.


Here is a wristshot to open the show:





Cheers, Mark

About the Patek Philippe Grand Complications Ref. 3940

The Patek Philippe Reference 3940 is a perpetual calendar wristwatch that was introduced in 1985, succeeding the Reference 3450. It is notable for its relatively slim profile and the integration of a perpetual calendar complication in a refined case. This reference became a cornerstone of Patek Philippe's complicated watch offerings for nearly two decades, establishing a design language for subsequent perpetual calendar models. It represents a significant period in the brand's modern history of complicated timepieces.

The watch features a 36mm case, typically crafted from yellow gold, rose gold, white gold, or platinum. It houses the self-winding Caliber 240 Q movement, which is known for its micro-rotor construction, contributing to the movement's thinness and allowing for a slimmer case profile. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. The dial is protected by a sapphire crystal, often accompanied by an interchangeable solid case back and a sapphire display back.

Reference 3940 is highly regarded by collectors for its classic proportions and the enduring appeal of its perpetual calendar display, which includes day, date, month, leap year cycle, and moon phases. It was produced in several series, with subtle variations in dial layout and typography, making early series examples particularly sought after. The reference is considered a benchmark for perpetual calendar watches and remains a significant piece for those appreciating traditional horological complications.

Specifications

Caliber
240 Q
Case
Yellow Gold, Rose Gold, White Gold, Platinum
Diameter
36mm
Dial
Silver, White, Opaline
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
RE
redcorals
Apr 28, 2016
Thanks Mark..I like everything about the watch but the bigger fonts on subdials..

...They appear too clustered too busy here. We realize the cases have gotten bigger from 34-36mm to 39-41mm, so to accommodate the same old movements the dials are laterally spread..that shearing can give us two results - this one with bigger subdials necking each other or subs being too aloof if kept smaller. But what if we met in btwn with these larger subs and smaller cleaner fonts. Its like looking at a gorgeous face with crooked teeth. Beautiful none the less but not perfect

MA
Mark in Paris
Apr 28, 2016
My pleasure, this is a beauty indeed

I think that from the 3940, 5140 to the 5327, one can find one of the finest elegant and refined perpetual calendars choice available. Thinness, shape, size, dial decoration etc... it can fit, from one generation to the next one, a wide array of tastes in that field. I don't have the same vision and impression over the dial balance and fonts etc, but I totally understand people may do. I think that when used to seeing smaller dials and especially 3940's for instance, it is harder to go through t

WA
watch-er
Apr 28, 2016
could not agree more

"to accommodate the same old movements the dials are laterally spread." An opportunity was missed here to create something.

DR
dr.kol
Apr 28, 2016
Thanks again Mark. I have only one

major issue: the case has grown but the dial looks busier and less readable/sober than the dial of the original 3940. It's funny; 3940 was so close to perfection that it seems there's no way to improve that without doing something to the engine (240Q). Still I like the new reference more than the earlier 5140. Best, Kari

MA
Mark in Paris
Apr 28, 2016
My pleasure Kari

Well, I think you also bring a point that 3940 people will emphasize. And this is perfectly understandable. On the other hand, if I take 5327 front pictures and forget the 3940, I think it is perfectly balanced. The thing is that the hour numerals are placed in the 5327 in a room that was not available before in the 3940. Thus, it is not exactly the same dial (whereas the difference was not that obvious with the 5140). If one is having the 3940 very strongly in his mind, then he may have difficu

DR
dr.kol
Apr 28, 2016
The issue is

just in the messy sub-dials. In 3940 they were clear and at least for me very readable. In the later versions the numbers are bigger and there's more "stuff" in the sub-dials. For me it kills the balance, beauty and readability. If I could use Photoshop, I would take 5327 dial and change the sub-dials to the one of 3940. I bet that the dial would look stunning. Patek Philippe is a great manufacturer and like everybody, they are not always right. I think they started to develop their iconic 3940

Available on the marketplace

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 32 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →