
Redcorals ignites a fascinating debate with his post showcasing a customized Patek Philippe Nautilus Ref. 5711 by Artisans de Genève. This piece challenges the community to consider the boundaries of luxury watch modification and whether an iconic reference benefits from bespoke alterations. His images prompt a critical discussion on aesthetics, value, and the very essence of an horological legend.


But the honest truth is, an icon/legend needs no reintroduction or modification. Any alteration would have to come from the company (PP) itself to make sense.
But not of this project, to put it plainly. H.
But with this one, “a solution in search of a problem” comes to mind.
...and the uncentered main spring near 12 is very disconcerting. There is an art to asymmetry and this ain't it : )
Not to design a skeleton nautilus 😅🤡
You have both of these watches in your hands and ask 50 strangers which one they would guess sells for $100,000... Where are you placing your bets??? I like it. Don’t necessarily love it knowing I could have a Haldimann, MB
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 35 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →