
KMII opens a thought-provoking discussion on the trend of pre-patinated lume in modern watches, questioning whether this artificial aging enhances or detracts from a timepiece's authenticity. He invites the community to weigh in on whether factory-aged lume is a welcome design choice or merely a shortcut to a 'lived-in' look.





in general, if there is a market for it, then why not. Modern lume does not age like Tritium did and adding a warm touch is okay. What is on the other hand a no go, are artificially aged new parts on vintage watches, like ghost bezels etc. CC
2 watches swayed me: JLC TRIBUTE 1931 and OMEGA SEAMASTER 300. But j agree with you that in the vast majority of cases it just looks tacky or disjointed to the rest of the design Like anything, can be charming if done well or totally repellent if not.
Did not think of this but you are of course absolutely right Thanks for your input CC!
So for you it is also depending on the application. Forgot about the SM300 but then there are many examples out there and listing all would have been impractical
Personally I\'d rather not buy watches with fake patina. But I have failed before so...
... I personally have no problems with using different colours of SL to give a watch face a nice look. The big benefit of SL is that it can support a watch design by using clear white or black lume, and not always a yellow/brown SL can count as faux patina, if executed in a subtle way. The example of the Zenith you showed, though, is one step too far. The worst thing about this one is that it actually looks... well I struggle finding the right term... let\'s say "expressively artificial", to be
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 33 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →