
Jay (Eire) sparks a compelling discussion on a topic many collectors grapple with: the ideal watch size. His original post challenges the community to confront their preferences versus prevailing trends, particularly regarding the enduring appeal and comfort of 36mm timepieces. This article synthesizes the community's diverse perspectives on wrist presence, evolving trends, and the nuanced factors beyond mere diameter that define a watch's fit.

For me I still find 36 too small but most of my watch now are 38-40mm which is my sweet spot
BTW that OP looks like it fits you perfectly.
Just my two cents, there is 42 and then there is 42. For example, my speedy is called "42" but it's really a 39, they count the rather obscure crown guards to get to "42." In addition, lug to lug it's smaller than my 39 Explorer!
Nor with 35 mm watches... Nor with 34 mm watches. Elegance is an attitude, not a matter of size... Best, Nicolas
38.5-40 mm is my sweet spot, however I’ll make an exception for a 42 mm watch that wears closer to 40 for example
I stick mostly to 36/37 and have 34mm as well. The diameter of the dial also makes a difference which isn’t talked about as often as the overall diameter of a watch. Funny you mention Tudor, the black bay 54 has seriously piqued my interest.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 85 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →