Collection
So, there’s a choice today. You can have one of these, 16520, steel case with either the black or white dial OR you could have a modern precious metal (not PT) Daytona. What do you do? And a second question, if you already had the below watch would you add the white dial (a nice pair) or take a walk
The Rolex Cellini reference 16520 is a notable example of the brand's dress watch offerings, distinct from its more robust sport models. This particular reference represents a period where Rolex explored more refined and understated designs, catering to a clientele seeking a timepiece suitable for formal occasions. It stands as a testament to Rolex's versatility in watchmaking, showcasing a different facet of their design philosophy compared to their Oyster Perpetual line.
This reference features a case crafted from stainless steel, measuring 40mm in diameter. It is equipped with an automatic movement, specifically the Caliber 4030, which is based on the Zenith El Primero. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 50 hours. A sapphire crystal protects the dial, and the watch is rated for a water resistance of 100 meters. The fixed tachymeter bezel is a characteristic feature.
For collectors, the reference 16520 appeals to those interested in the evolution of Rolex's dress watch designs and their use of external base movements. Its production run from 1988 to 2000 places it within a specific era of Rolex manufacturing. The black dial and Oyster bracelet contribute to its overall aesthetic, making it a recognizable piece within the Cellini collection.
I have the SS 116520 White and Black dial pair. So I may be a little biased.
The pair would be nice, assuming I could find a good one. But I’m still a little tempted by the modern Oysterflex as it gives you something different.
The 16520 Zenith and the new ceramic bezel Daytona in steel. As I get a bit older I find the legibility of the white dials a bit better. Given where pricing and value sits today, I’ve been tempted to cash in and get myself another PP or FPJ time only piece, but then hold back because there should be a Daytona in a watch collection. If anything can hold its value with a chance of appreciation...it’s the Daytona.
It’s THE chronograph in my opinion. The two whites are a nice pair.
The only reasons I’m thinking about the newer Daytona is 1) to have a WG or RG and/or 2) the Oysterflex.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
