Rolex Explorer 214270 Ownership Story
Collection

Rolex Explorer 214270 Ownership Story

By Harry2 · Aug 2, 2016 · 13 replies
Harry2
WPS member · Rolex forum
13 replies8455 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

My Rolex Explorer 214270 story This article is not intended to be a review, dear reader (as that has been done to death), but an account of my time with my Explorer. As many young men seem to have done I purchased my Explorer after coming in to some money, as a belated 21st birthday present to mysel

13 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
My Rolex Explorer 214270 story

This article is not intended to be a review, dear reader (as that has been done to death), but an account of my time with my Explorer. As many young men seem to have done I purchased my Explorer after coming in to some money, as a belated 21st birthday present to myself.  I had participated in a domestic operation in the Army and on return I had decided to do away with my military pursuits and start a new and different life. I'd saved some of my pay and I though that if I didn't buy my one good watch now I never would. Needless to say, I never thought I'd end up engulfed in the madness of our wonderful hobby. My father had told me that when he had the money to buy a Rolex watch duty free when he was young, the model he wanted was out of stock at the airport so he kept the money and never had the opportunity again! Life does have a tendency to get in the way of the most important things, and I'd be dammed if that was going to happen to me!

I bought the watch for too much money from J. Farren Price Sydney in early December 2013.  I later learned that I had payed above retail price, despite them telling me that negotiation on the price of an Explorer was impossible.  However at the time I was entirely unconcerned about the price (within reason), I had been waiting most of my life for the moment I got to buy a Rolex new! I have fond memories from my childhood of sitting on the floor of my grandparents living room and pulling all the National Geographic magazines off the shelves and going through them one by one and putting them back as I went.  My topics of interest were mainly inhospitable places, adventures, and of course the well placed and expertly composed Rolex ads. Even at that early age I loved the aesthetic of Rolex watches, and I always wanted my childhood watches to at least vaguely resemble a Rolex design. My favourite for most of my formative years was the two-tone Submariner with blue dial and bezel.  As I got older my taste changed and my heart was set on either an Explorer 214270 or the Explorer II 216570 with a black dial (I actually like the white dial more now). I have always been fascinated by stories of human endurance and courage, so the association with Everest made the Explorer the obvious watch for me. 

So after the purchase of my new watch, I had the time measuring instrument for the wrist that I was sure best suited me! It was a perfectly made, and stylish reminder whenever I checked the time that I also (at least I like to think) have the guts and endurance of an intrepid mountaineer, polar explorer or desert trekker. My watch felt as if it were the end game, there was no better and certainly no alternative.

Then the rug was pulled out from underneath me, The Prodigal Guide did a review. It was an excellent episode of 'Talking Hands' that I thoroughly enjoyed, but they pointed out two fatal flaws in my newly acquired horological juggernaut.  What has been seen cannot be unseen, the hands and the questionable case proportions.  I don't think I need to say too much about the hands, but what I will say is this: After Baselworld 2016 I felt betrayed by Rolex. They knew, and I think they had a plan. There is no way I can accept that they didn't already have the improved hands designed for the 214270, I think they just did it to drive us all insane enough to buy another.  I am hoping beyond hope that I can have the hands upgraded at service, I have emailed Rolex Australia regarding this and have received no reply for months.

The second point is one that I have not yet reached a real conclusion about.  The execution of enlarging the case.  Sometimes I feel it looks rather like the explorer simply got fat (as pointed out in 'Talking Hands') while other times I feel it reminds me a lot of the proportions of the small crown Sub on it's bracelet. So it does seem to depend on the day of the week, sometimes I love that case and sometimes I don't. The 1019 is a well loved reference and it has a similar case, perhaps it's just the passage of time that is needed.  Given a long enough period I'm sure we just get used to some designs, not unlike Gerald Genta's integrated bracelet watches.

The other issue with modern Rolex is it's so, well, Rolex!  It's very shiny, it's very noticeable and it's very common to see on people's wrists that don't even care about watches. I have gone through many phases of hating and loving the watch and I think once I figure out what it's worth selling it for, it will have to move on.  What I want from this watch is a tough piece with horological clout. The explorer ticks all the boxes, nothing can beat it in its own realm. The problem is it looks like a piece of jewellery! I can't help that think there must be an alternative out there.

Whatever it is it needs to be tough and less shiny.  I almost sold it for an Omega Seamaster 300 at one stage, but again it was too big and too shiny.  Now I'm leaning more towards an Ingenieur automatic.  You just don't see them around much (at least not in Sydney) and it has the option of an OEM rubber strap. I just need to try it on to see.
The Explorer 214270 is a great watch no doubt, but the watch for me? After the fiasco with the hands and of course the 'Rolex' factor, I'm still not so sure. When I find something that I feel can replace it I think I will. Now that I have learnt more and also experienced more watches, it doesn't seem like the Everest watch it should be.

Thanks for reading, all comments and suggestions are not only welcome but looked forward to! 

 





About the Rolex Milgauss Ref. 1019

The Rolex Milgauss reference 1019 is a specialized instrument watch designed for scientists and engineers working in environments with strong magnetic fields. Introduced in the mid-1950s, it was developed to withstand magnetic interference up to 1,000 gauss, a significant technical achievement for its era. Unlike other Rolex professional models, the Milgauss 1019 maintained a more understated aesthetic, prioritizing its antimagnetic function over overt sporting characteristics. It stands apart from later Milgauss iterations due to its unique dial configurations and case proportions.

This reference features a 38 mm stainless steel case, housing the automatic Rolex Caliber 1580 movement. This movement is protected by an internal soft iron Faraday cage, which deflects magnetic fields away from the escapement, ensuring accuracy. The watch is fitted with an acrylic crystal and offers a water resistance of 100 meters. The smooth bezel contributes to its functional and less decorative appearance, aligning with its purpose as a scientific tool.

For collectors, the Milgauss 1019 is valued for its specific historical context and its technical innovation in antimagnetic watchmaking. It represents a period when Rolex focused on creating highly specialized tools for professional use. Variants exist with different dial finishes, including black and silver, some featuring a distinctive red-tipped seconds hand. Its relative rarity compared to other vintage Rolex professional models makes it a point of interest for those seeking a less common and historically significant piece.

Specifications

Caliber
1580
Case
Stainless steel
Diameter
38 mm
Dial
Black
Water Resist.
100m
Crystal
Acrylic
Advertisement
The Discussion
AM
amanico
Aug 2, 2016

The flavor is flawless. Best, and thanks for having taken the time to share your experience with us! Nicolas

BA
Baron - Mr Red
Aug 2, 2016

.....but I would add a number of points. First, in my mind, the Explorer is perhaps one of the most anonymous Rolex in the range. The classic icon is the Submariner. You can spot a Submariner from 100yds. The Explorer is a watch that, in my view, rally goes under the radar. Second, you say that it is very shiny. How about putting it on a leather strap or a Nato strap? That would dull-it-down somewhat. Would also make it even more anonymous. Third, you say that in its space, the Explorer can't be

DE
descartes1
Aug 2, 2016

But in your case I think Nicholas is right. It\'s seems your tastes run towards heritage style pieces. Either way you\'ll have a very nice watch. Good luck.

HA
Harry2
Aug 2, 2016

I've been bitten by vintage Rolex before, it really turned me too to be honest boys! Plus I want it to be fully functional, waterproof etc. I'm thinking maybe waiting to see what the next refresh of the Ingenieur is like, I love Genta's integrated bracelet designs! And they have their own brand of cool to them. You either love them or hate them! That Porsche analogy is brilliant and I will now reconsider vintage, just because of that :P Perhaps a luminova service dial 1016 with a fat case...

MI
Mikey11
Aug 2, 2016

Loved reading your thoughts on you watch taste and how it has evolved over time. My personal choice, of course, would be the 5513 Sub. I am a little biased about this watch as you can see by my post a few down on the feed. I love having it in a strap instead of the oyster bracelet to cut down on the bulk when wearing a dress shirt. Thanks again for the post!!

HA
Harry2
Aug 2, 2016

I love vintage Rolex as much as anyone, the problem is the place of this watch in the collection is the 'go anywhere, do anything' watch. I'm really not sure what beats it, objectively speaking.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 13 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →