
LarsG's recent acquisition of a Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 16710 highlights a common dilemma for collectors: finding the right fit, even after years of coveting a different reference. His journey from a long-held desire for a Submariner to an unexpected connection with the GMT-Master II offers valuable insights into how wrist presence and subtle design differences can profoundly impact a watch's appeal. This article explores LarsG's experience and the community's shared appreciation for this iconic reference.



The Rolex Submariner reference 14060 represents a transitional period for the brand's professional dive watch line. It is notable for being a no-date Submariner, maintaining a clean dial aesthetic favored by many collectors. This reference succeeded earlier no-date Submariners and preceded later iterations with updated movements and materials, positioning it as a bridge between vintage and modern Rolex production.
This reference features a 40mm stainless steel Oyster case, characteristic of the Submariner line. It is equipped with the automatic caliber 3000 movement, providing a power reserve of approximately 42 hours. The watch utilizes a sapphire crystal, offering enhanced scratch resistance, and is water-resistant to 300 meters. The unidirectional rotating bezel is fitted with an aluminum insert.
The 14060 appeals to collectors seeking a Submariner without the date complication and its associated cyclops lens. It is recognized for its robust construction and functional design. While sharing many characteristics with its date-equipped counterparts, the absence of a date window distinguishes it within the Submariner family and contributes to its distinct collector appeal.
I too found the 114060 much too blocky and bulky for my 7 inch wrist - So I sold it and never looked back! You wear this GMT well, seems to fit your wrist nicely. Congrats and enjoy! 👍🏻
4 or 5 digit GMT is the way to go ♥️ I'm wearing mine just right now
And the Air-King, and the Yacht-Master and the …… Enjoy!
It’s surprisingly good looking watch.
Yeah, I actually read your statements s couple of times, and always second your motions.
And for good reason (I see now)
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 30 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →