New Release
Gary_g's hands-on review of the Rolex Land-Dweller in Monaco offers a candid perspective on a highly anticipated new reference. His experience highlights the crucial distinction between appreciating a watch's technical and aesthetic merits and forming a genuine emotional connection. This article explores why even a meticulously crafted timepiece might not resonate with every collector, drawing on community insights into design, innovation, and personal preference.
Perhaps a smooth bezel as on the Oysterquartz models of yesteryear and baton indices could help… The bracelet definitely looks impressive. What I’m not too fond of is that the lateral case profile isn’t as angular as it perhaps should be. Overall, the design is certainly well done and I am sure we will see further dial and bezel iterations that will bring something for everyone.
Woo Hoo…did you walk the track? Loved it…but 2 days max for me…
As I find the movement interesting and on paperI like elements of it. But the overall piece feels very cold. It didn’t wake any emotions in me.
If offered, I’ll take one.
Is the next watch on my list. I love the movement tech and how thin it is. I know the dial is controversial but I applaud them for doing something different than what they usually do, often being conservative to a fault.
I can’t get with the integrated watch/bracelet thing…and find watch sites annoying (not this one or anyone here) pushing the integrated/compact/perfect sized/etc thing on me. I feel like this is part of that movement. Maybe I am getting older and cranky, but, have a hard time listening to nitwits who are now watch “journalists” telling me about the history of watches and what is perfect, how great the integrated bracelet is…how perfect 38mm is for everyone…how I should be looking at smaller watc
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 55 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
