
Abu Alex's original post delves into a significant lawsuit concerning a Chicago-based Authorized Dealer (AD) accused of diverting highly sought-after Rolex and Patek Philippe timepieces to grey market dealers. This thread explores the alleged practices within the luxury watch retail landscape, prompting a vital discussion among collectors about market dynamics and ethical distribution. Alex's contribution highlights a critical issue impacting both brands and genuine enthusiasts.



As of yet neither Rolex nor Patek Philippe has joined the dispute. That will be almost inevitable if the alleged scheme is proven true in court.
but Patek.com doesn’t mention them being an AD
Let's say that the way they phrased it on their site might easily be "misunderstood", so to speak: "C.D.Peacock is proud to be the premier authorized retailer for Patek Philippe in Chicago." ;-)
Sometimes the store's owner/management is involved. Sometimes only the salespeople are involved and are not telling the managers. Either way, grey-market dealers get their products either with the store manager's knowledge or without.
Something has to be done by the industry. Maybe Stern felt some upcoming issues with the Nautilus (just my guess). Why not get a random allocation to clients, and pay the full price upfront if you are amongst the top 5-10 slots. A solution can be found.
But I stopped being into Rolex many years ago and I don’t even know if I will be around in two years’ time in Bahrain.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 69 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →