Rolex Sea-Dweller 4000 vs. Vintage 1665
Review

Rolex Sea-Dweller 4000 vs. Vintage 1665

By Baron - Mr Red · Feb 2, 2016 · 22 replies
Baron - Mr Red
WPS member · Rolex forum
22 replies12631 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

I don't own the most recent rendition of the Sea-Dweller. Though I am tempted. The Sea-Dweller 4000 has a lot to boast about. My first question is.....how many on this forum have one? What has been your experience? My second question concerns the attraction of the modern Sea-Dweller versus the origi

22 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
I don't own the most recent rendition of the Sea-Dweller. Though I am tempted. The Sea-Dweller 4000 has a lot to boast about. My first question is.....how many on this forum have one? What has been your experience?




My second question concerns the attraction of the modern Sea-Dweller versus the original 1665 Sea-Dweller. The vintage piece is captivating in so many ways. Maybe it is unfair to compare the two? In fact, it seems very unfair. The vintage has had time to develop patina in a way that the modern version never will. The vintage has its red writing that has become iconic to the watch. The vintage led he way for Rolex on dive pioneering, technological breakthrough and the establishment of Rolex as a serious tool watch. 




Yet, in a world where "and" is so much better than "or", is there room to have the 4000 and the 1665?

I am curious what others have experienced on the Sea-Dweller 4000?


Best,

Joe

About the Rolex 1665 Ref. 1665

The Rolex Sea-Dweller reference 1665 is a significant model within the brand's professional tool watch lineage, distinguished by its enhanced water resistance compared to contemporary Submariner models. This reference was developed to meet the demands of professional saturation divers, featuring a helium escape valve (HEV) integrated into the case side, a key differentiator from other Rolex dive watches of its era. It represents a period of innovation in deep-sea horology, offering a robust solution for extreme underwater environments.

This reference features a 40 mm stainless steel case, designed for durability and resistance to high pressures. It is powered by the automatic Caliber 1575, a chronometer-certified movement known for its reliability and precision, offering a power reserve of approximately 42 to 48 hours. The watch is fitted with an acrylic crystal, contributing to its water resistance rating of 610 meters, and typically features a black dial with luminous hour markers.

For collectors, the reference 1665 is notable for its functional design and its place in the evolution of professional dive watches. Early examples, often referred to as "Double Red Sea-Dweller" (DRSD) due to two lines of red text on the dial, are particularly sought after. Later versions feature all-white text. The presence of the helium escape valve and its robust construction make it a distinct and historically important piece for those interested in the development of specialized timekeeping instruments.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal. 1575
Case
Stainless steel
Diameter
40 mm
Dial
Black
Water Resist.
610m
Crystal
Acrylic
Advertisement
The Discussion
LU
Luis6
Feb 2, 2016

It\'s a fantastic watch. Very balanced and symmetrical look, slimmer (than the submariner) lugs and case shape, matte dial. The only reason I let it go is because it\'s a bit thick for my skinny wrist, hence comfort sacrifices after wearing it for a few hours. But for people with 17+ wrists, this watch should fit perfectly!

AM
amanico
Feb 2, 2016

So why not adding a modern iteration of the Seadweller? I would go for the monster, the James Cameron Deep Sea Dweller Blue and Green. This one pushes the limits of the concept farther, deeper, if I may say. The one you are considering is a wiser version. I would go farther, yes. Best, Nicolas

BA
Baron - Mr Red
Feb 2, 2016

I am seriously tempted on the SD4000. The trouble is....so many projects.

BA
Baron - Mr Red
Feb 2, 2016

.....interesting that you actually sold your because of its lack of comfort

SH
shortys home
Feb 2, 2016

...and I seriously consider it one of the best 6 digit Rolex sports watches. The combination of ceramic bezel, thinner lugs than the Submariner, matte black dial, Cromalight and the very comfortable Glidelock clasp makes it a winner imho. Cheers Henrik

SP
Spangles - Dr. Tabby
Feb 2, 2016

The 3235 is a great movement and it'll be in my next Rolex

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 22 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →