
In this insightful discussion, WatchProSite contributor 'oyster case' revisits a past horological decision, contemplating a trade that would bring the coveted Rolex Sea-Dweller 4000 (SD4k) reference 116600 into their collection. Their reflection on the SD4k's unique case shape and wrist presence sparks a vibrant community debate about its enduring appeal and potential as a future collector's item. This thread offers valuable perspectives for anyone considering the SD4k or navigating complex collection decisions.

The Sea-Dweller reference 116600 marked the return of the 40mm case size for the model, a dimension that had been absent from the Sea-Dweller lineup for some time. This reference reintroduced several classic Sea-Dweller design elements, distinguishing it from its larger contemporary, the Sea-Dweller 4000. It was produced for a relatively short period, making it a notable transitional model within the brand's professional tool watch offerings.
This reference features a stainless steel case measuring 40mm in diameter and 15.3mm in thickness. It is equipped with a unidirectional rotating bezel made of black ceramic with a 60-minute graduation. The watch is powered by the automatic caliber 3135, offering a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. A sapphire crystal protects the black dial, which includes a date complication without the cyclops lens, a characteristic feature of the Sea-Dweller line.
Appealing to collectors who appreciate traditional proportions and the technical capabilities of a professional dive watch, the 116600 is recognized for its blend of heritage design and modern materials. Its limited production run contributes to its appeal among enthusiasts seeking a Sea-Dweller with a more classic case size and specific aesthetic details, such as the matte-like black dial and the absence of the cyclops over the date.
But this is the one Iโm wearing right now, and if I could have only one keeper Rolex, this would be it. Bought new when ADs sold them at a discount! Kent
You were wise then and now, that SD 4k makes so much sense as a one Rolex piece.
If not, Iโd go ahead with it. I like the sd4k and I bet youโll enjoy the hell out of it
It was made for such a short time, quite unpopular and a slow selling piece. It has all the ingredients for a future grail in my opinion. AD quickly disposed of the remaining supply to make room for the 50th anniversary SD 43 in the store. Those were the days.
SD4k is nice. I like the z-blue so much, if i have one, I will never trade or part with it. It is so different and electrifying. The DJ 36 is nice (is it the tt version you posted with the smooth bezel?) I like dive watches to be balanced in weight, not top-heavy - i really take them diving. It depends on the purpose of the SD4k. Does it fill a purpose or โvoidโ in your collection?
Since the release itโs imho one of the best Rolex diver ๐๐ผ
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 31 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →