Rolex Sea-Dweller Ref. 116600: A Collector's Decade-Long Pursuit
Collection

Rolex Sea-Dweller Ref. 116600: A Collector's Decade-Long Pursuit

By Mr.Gatsby · Aug 31, 2024 · 25 replies
Mr.Gatsby
WPS member · Rolex forum
25 replies5992 views3 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Mr.Gatsby, a seasoned collector, shares his journey to acquiring the Rolex Sea-Dweller ref. 116600, a watch he initially overlooked a decade ago. His post highlights the evolving perception of certain references within the collector community and the personal satisfaction of finally obtaining a long-desired timepiece. This article explores why the 116600, once less sought after, has become a cherished modern stainless steel dive watch.

25 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
God this work stress is killing me. Need to unwind. Decided to take the plunge. Did my usual late AM workout, a late lunch and off to town to pick up an SD. When this was first released I was offered one at the AD. At the time nobody wanted it and I was deeply emerged in the vintage Rolex segment. So I didn’t really have the funds nor the appetite to buy one, even though I knew it was something of pretty good value.

Today I realized that dream. Read all the reviews, did all the analyzing in my head. Yeah, I guess I want a serious dive watch and the ref. 116600 fits the bill. As far as modern stainless steel dive watches go, I think this and the 126610LV are the pieces I’d love to have.

Some wrist shots:






Thanks for looking. HAGWE all.

About the Rolex Sea-Dweller 4000 Ref. 116600

The Sea-Dweller reference 116600 marked the return of the 40mm case size for the model, a dimension that had been absent from the Sea-Dweller lineup for some time. This reference reintroduced several classic Sea-Dweller design elements, distinguishing it from its larger contemporary, the Sea-Dweller 4000. It was produced for a relatively short period, making it a notable transitional model within the brand's professional tool watch offerings.

This reference features a stainless steel case measuring 40mm in diameter and 15.3mm in thickness. It is equipped with a unidirectional rotating bezel made of black ceramic with a 60-minute graduation. The watch is powered by the automatic caliber 3135, offering a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. A sapphire crystal protects the black dial, which includes a date complication without the cyclops lens, a characteristic feature of the Sea-Dweller line.

Appealing to collectors who appreciate traditional proportions and the technical capabilities of a professional dive watch, the 116600 is recognized for its blend of heritage design and modern materials. Its limited production run contributes to its appeal among enthusiasts seeking a Sea-Dweller with a more classic case size and specific aesthetic details, such as the matte-like black dial and the absence of the cyclops over the date.

Specifications

Caliber
3135
Case
Stainless steel
Diameter
40 mm
Dial
Black
Water Resist.
1220m
Crystal
Sapphire crystal

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
MR
Mr.Gatsby
Aug 31, 2024

Cool watch but too big for me. I’m really on a Rolex craze. Something very special came this week I’ll share with you later. Best Gatsby

MR
Mr.Gatsby
Aug 31, 2024

Back on my desk working with the SD Best Gatsby

MR
Mr.Gatsby
Aug 31, 2024

This SD is a dream come true too late… I wanted to pick it up 10 years ago. But at last it’s here. Proper tool watch that’s not widely available. Best Gatsby

MR
Mr.Gatsby
Aug 31, 2024

But for you Mon ami, a sneak peak ;-) Best Gatsby

CH
Champthekid
Aug 31, 2024

Looks great. I bought mine as per your statement when no one wanted them 😁

MR
Mr.Gatsby
Aug 31, 2024

Have a mind that resonates with mine. We seem to have very similar approaches to buying watches. I appreciate your affirmation hopefully we are trodding down the right path of watch collecting. Best Gatsby

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 25 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →