Collection
Geross's post celebrates the Rolex Submariner 14060, highlighting its classic appeal and accuracy. The ensuing discussion delves into a comparison with its modern counterpart, the 124060, sparking a debate about the evolution of Submariner design and the enduring charm of older references. This thread offers insights into why the 14060 remains a beloved choice among collectors.
The Rolex Submariner reference 14060 represents a transitional period for the brand's professional dive watch line. It is notable for being a no-date Submariner, maintaining a clean dial aesthetic favored by many collectors. This reference succeeded earlier no-date Submariners and preceded later iterations with updated movements and materials, positioning it as a bridge between vintage and modern Rolex production.
This reference features a 40mm stainless steel Oyster case, characteristic of the Submariner line. It is equipped with the automatic caliber 3000 movement, providing a power reserve of approximately 42 hours. The watch utilizes a sapphire crystal, offering enhanced scratch resistance, and is water-resistant to 300 meters. The unidirectional rotating bezel is fitted with an aluminum insert.
The 14060 appeals to collectors seeking a Submariner without the date complication and its associated cyclops lens. It is recognized for its robust construction and functional design. While sharing many characteristics with its date-equipped counterparts, the absence of a date window distinguishes it within the Submariner family and contributes to its distinct collector appeal.
whether to keep my 14060m. I have the modern 124060, which is indeed more heft and wrist presence. But there is a sort of elegance to the older model, even though Subs don’t require to be elegant per se. Still, they’re different, and since i’m trying to consolidate I keep coming back to this debate.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 22 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
