Review
Nick's original post delves into the robust capabilities of the Rolex Submariner Ref. 16610, subjecting it to an extreme shock test involving a .50 caliber intermediate cartridge. His experiment provides a unique, real-world assessment of the watch's durability, moving beyond anecdotal evidence to quantify its performance under significant stress. This article synthesizes Nick's findings with community insights on watch resilience and appropriate usage.
The Rolex Submariner reference 16610 is a robust and functional diver's watch, representing a key evolution within the Submariner lineage. It succeeded the reference 168000 and introduced incremental updates while maintaining the core design principles of the professional tool watch. This reference is distinguished by its use of 904L stainless steel and a sapphire crystal, enhancing its durability and water resistance for demanding use. It remained a cornerstone of the brand's sports watch offerings for many years.
This reference features a 40mm case crafted from 904L stainless steel, housing the automatic Caliber 3135 movement. This self-winding mechanical movement is known for its reliability and precision, offering a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. The watch is fitted with a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal and is water-resistant to 300 meters (1,000 feet), secured by a Triplock winding crown. The unidirectional rotating bezel is equipped with an aluminum insert.
The 16610 appeals to collectors seeking a modern classic Submariner that bridges the gap between vintage and contemporary iterations. It represents the last generation of Submariners with an aluminum bezel insert before the introduction of ceramic bezels. Variants primarily involve minor dial changes over its production run, such as lug hole cases versus no lug hole cases, and the transition from tritium to Luminova luminescence. Its long production period makes it a widely recognized and accessible reference.
The issue as i have heard is the shock knocks off the lubricant which in turn caused excessive friction.
As a golfer and a hunter I am reasonable certain the shock from the 50 is considerably more than from a golf swing. I had to repair my Patek 5170 after shooting a 308 with it on, a much smaller shock than from a 50 caliber.
I now always remove my watch when motor-mowing my grass lawn. I once did not and the watch I was wearing (Omega Constellation) suffered bad timekeeping afterwards because of the vibration. I now always remove a watch from my wrist if carrying out an activity involving severe vibration or heavy impact (electric drill set to hammer, swinging heavy hammer or pick-axe, using a stone chisel etc). Clive
"...Detroit looting season..."?! Is that really funny?
I usually wear quartz. If it s mechanical, I wear a water resistant 10 ATM (at least) watch and hang it from my belt. No problems so far and I can still see the watch face clearly at all times. Thanks
The loss of any life is a tragedy for a family.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 35 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
