Discussion
Jay (Eire) initiates a compelling discussion on the unique satisfaction derived from owning and wearing a Rolex, particularly his 'Hulk' Submariner. He explores the interplay of branding, aspiration, and fundamental product quality that, for him, sets Rolex apart from even high horology brands like F.P. Journe, Patek Philippe, or A. Lange & Söhne. This article delves into the community's diverse perspectives on Rolex's enduring appeal and its singular position in the luxury watch market.
The Submariner Date reference 116610LV, introduced in 2010, is distinguished by its vibrant green dial and matching green Cerachrom bezel. This model replaced the previous 16610LV, known as the "Kermit," and marked a significant update to the Submariner line with its "Maxi Case" and ceramic bezel insert. It represents a modern interpretation of the Submariner, offering enhanced durability and a distinct aesthetic within the collection.
This reference features an Oystersteel case measuring 40mm in diameter, housing the automatic Caliber 3135. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. The watch is fitted with a sapphire crystal that includes a Cyclops lens over the date display, and it is water-resistant to 300 meters. The unidirectional rotating bezel is crafted from green Cerachrom ceramic, known for its scratch resistance and color stability.
Appealing to collectors interested in modern Rolex sports watches with a unique colorway, the 116610LV is often referred to as the "Hulk" due to its green coloration. It stands out from the more traditional black or blue Submariner models, offering a bolder visual presence. This reference was produced for a decade, becoming a notable entry in the Submariner's evolution before its discontinuation.
If you told me I could only collect one brand, it would be Rolex. If you told me I could only wear one watch for the rest of my life, it would be my datejust. If you actually consider a watch for its main purpose of telling the time and being reliable, I don't think there's any brand that has Rolex beat. Even if you put it up against a quartz or smart watch, those will lose to the Rolex in longevity and quality. Any high horology masterpiece will lose in toughness and reliability and, most likel
branding is. Exactly why (no dis on Rolex or Rolex owners) I didn’t go with them. For me it was too expected. When the brand becomes so status driven and ubiquitous it waters down (for me) the authenticity. There are IMO similar brands like Porsche that on the one hand make some of the best vehicles on four wheels but on the other are very often owned by people that would be happy just to be seen sitting in one rather than really driving it for sport. Point is it’s a fine line.
I know lots of ppl who own one in pristine condition and refuse to use it as a daily beater because this is a keeper and they want to preserve it. Same for myself.
But how do you mean by aspirational? Do you mean‘how difficult to get’ (not financially)? In such case, why wouldn’t you consider PP or AP aspirational? Perhaps you do see those also as such, but not necessarily the same way as Rolex.
Rolex has "conditioned" or "trained" a lot of watch enthusiasts to believe in the Rolex proportions and ratios. The size, shape, weight of the watch. The functionality and versatility. There's something about a Rolex watch that is just so perfect, and then they change it by 1mm and you think it's a life changing event and a meaningful improvement. They "teach" you to believe that all watches should look like this and all watches are compared to their ideal proportions. Imitators are deemed copie
The thing with Rolex for me anyway, I always want to add another reference as soon as i get one...i just keep wanting more )) And i LOVE wearing those already in the collection
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 30 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
