Simpler Time-Only Watches: Discussion
Discussion

Simpler Time-Only Watches: Discussion

By Clueless_Collector · May 11, 2021 · 44 replies
Clueless_Collector
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
44 replies4466 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Clueless_Collector's original post sparks a fascinating debate among collectors: the preference for time-only watches with or without a seconds hand. This discussion delves into the aesthetic and functional considerations that drive these choices, highlighting how subtle design elements can profoundly impact a watch's appeal. Readers will gain insight into the nuanced perspectives of seasoned enthusiasts regarding dial purity, legibility, and the artistry of minimalist horology.

44 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Do you prefer with seconds hand or just 2 hands.

I personally prefer second hands so I can tell the watch is running.












Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
SH
sham1
May 11, 2021

For me when it comes to two and three handed dress watches, the important factor is the elegance of the case and the dial. The hands, the numerals, the shape of the lugs all matter possibly more than the number of hands.

CL
Clueless_Collector
May 11, 2021

My 1815 is the HG, the lighting condition can make it look like YG or RG 😊 Thanks kindly

CL
Clueless_Collector
May 11, 2021

Hence the recent Patek Philippe 6119 was phrased as “Simplicity is difficult”

HO
houstonian
May 11, 2021

It helps you to focus on the beauty of the watch. I hope to own this one day soon. Photo credit Watch Professor.

CL
Clueless_Collector
May 11, 2021

If not my for 1815 HG F A Lange, I will jump on that.

SH
sham1
May 11, 2021

destroyed the watch. 39mm is ok for a dress watch but those lugs have made the watch wear even larger.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 44 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →