
Clueless_Collector's original post sparks a fascinating debate among collectors: the preference for time-only watches with or without a seconds hand. This discussion delves into the aesthetic and functional considerations that drive these choices, highlighting how subtle design elements can profoundly impact a watch's appeal. Readers will gain insight into the nuanced perspectives of seasoned enthusiasts regarding dial purity, legibility, and the artistry of minimalist horology.


For me when it comes to two and three handed dress watches, the important factor is the elegance of the case and the dial. The hands, the numerals, the shape of the lugs all matter possibly more than the number of hands.
My 1815 is the HG, the lighting condition can make it look like YG or RG 😊 Thanks kindly
Hence the recent Patek Philippe 6119 was phrased as “Simplicity is difficult”
It helps you to focus on the beauty of the watch. I hope to own this one day soon. Photo credit Watch Professor.
If not my for 1815 HG F A Lange, I will jump on that.
destroyed the watch. 39mm is ok for a dress watch but those lugs have made the watch wear even larger.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 44 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →