
Emmanuel, known as quattro on WatchProSite, offers a hands-on review of five Tudor models, providing invaluable insights for collectors considering these references. His detailed observations, particularly on wearability and aesthetic nuances, serve as a critical resource for understanding Tudor's current lineup. This article distills his initial impressions and the community's subsequent discussion, highlighting key considerations for each watch.



























The Royal Oak reference 5402 is recognized as the original iteration of the model, introduced in 1972. This reference established the design language that would define the Royal Oak collection, characterized by its integrated bracelet and octagonal bezel secured by visible screws. It was initially presented as a luxury sport watch, distinguishing itself through its material and finishing in a period dominated by more traditional dress watch aesthetics. The 5402 was produced in various series, with the A-series being the earliest and most sought after by collectors.
The watch features a 39mm stainless steel case, often referred to as the "Jumbo" size, which was considered substantial for its era. It houses the self-winding Caliber 2121, a thin movement derived from Jaeger-LeCoultre's Caliber 920, known for its full-rotor design. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 40 hours. The crystal protecting the dial is acrylic, and the watch offers a water resistance of 50 meters, suitable for general wear.
For collectors, the reference 5402 holds significance as the foundational model of a major watch series. Its various production series (A, B, C, D) present nuances in dial text and case back engravings that are closely examined. The integrated steel bracelet is an integral part of its design, contributing to its distinct profile. The blue dial, often with a "tapisserie" pattern, is a hallmark of this early reference, though other dial variations exist.
OK so I get the Pelagos Ultra is a WR of 1000m but the rest are mostly just 200m WR and again most are just simple 3 handers why do they need to be so thick? The only thing I can think of is that Rolex mandate this to stop Tudor from eating their lunch and stealing all their business. Marc
I look forward to seeing the new 58, especially a black-dial version, if they ever make one!
And maybe thickness is indeed a way to "protect" Rolex... Best, Emmanuel
I personally didn't like the glowy dial and didn't even ask to try it on. But I've posted some live photos found online here if you want to have a look. Best, Emmanuel
I personally didn't respond to this model. Best, Emmanuel
It was charming and affordable enough for me to grab one used... but I just didn't end up loving it, and you are giving the exact reasons why. The Ranger is the missed opportunity here: why is Tudor still making that watch 39mm? They should have sized it down like the Explorer to 36 or, even better, pushed the envelope in size by offering it in 34mm.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 31 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →