
Singingbee seeks community advice on a significant acquisition, torn between the Tudor Heritage Chrono Blue, the Black Bay Chrono, and the Black Bay GMT. His post outlines key criteria for his next watch—high water resistance, bracelet, durability for weekend wear, and versatility—and provides personal pros and cons for each model. The inclusion of wristshots offers valuable context for readers to weigh in on his dilemma.




It’s a much more interesting (and modern) movement. Long power reserve, column wheel, vertical clutch, supposedly designed by the engineers that also helped make Rolex’s Daytona calibre (albeit for Breitling). The black dial w/ steel case is a very safe combo and will look good in most situations.
Don’t think you’ll ever get bored of it, classic design.
Also, it was designed with a focus on repairability, so it has some features that I think contributed to Tudor’s decision to use it; auto-centering of chrono parts, partially modular design, etc.
I just feel the other two remind me of other watches. The heritage chrono is a faithful representation not trying to be anything else. Bill
recommend as follows; -Tudor BB Chrono - because it is beautiful, robust, water resistant, supermodern chronograph movement. Downside --> thick and chunky. -Tudor Chrono Heritage - stunningly beautiful but mostly in summertime i would say. Also a bit chunky. -Tudor GMT - three snowflake hands on a watch, that is just too much. A bit chunky too. As most Tudor BB's are.
Followed by the GMT. For some reason I was never turned on by the bb chrono. It always seemed to be trying to hard if that makes sense. So many things going on at once
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 29 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →