Tudor Ranger 36mm vs. 39mm Reference Guide
Reference Guide

Tudor Ranger 36mm vs. 39mm Reference Guide

By quattro · Mar 19, 2026 · 16 replies
quattro
WPS member · Rolex forum
16 replies555 views20 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 ✉ 🔗

Emmanuel, known as quattro on WatchProSite, provides an invaluable photo review comparing the Tudor Ranger in its 36mm and 39mm iterations. His detailed visual guide, complete with reference numbers and movement specifications, offers collectors a crucial resource for discerning the subtle yet significant differences between these popular field watch models. This comparative analysis is essential for anyone considering adding a Tudor Ranger to their collection, highlighting the nuances that often dictate a collector's preference.

16 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Just a simple photo review to compare the different models of the Tudor Ranger.

First 36 mm, then 39 mm, then both side by side.

Enjoy!

Best, Emmanuel


A/ 36 mm DIAMETER

BEIGE (“DUNE WHITE”) DIAL: Ref. M79930-0007 (bracelet) & M79930-0008 (fabric strap)

BLACK DIAL: Ref. M79930-0001 (bracelet) & M79930-0003 (fabric strap)

36 x 11 mm steel case, Manufacture Calibre MT5400 (COSC), Waterproof to 100m (330 ft)







Watch by Rolex, M79930-0007, Ranger, Tudor










credit: Monochrome, @watch_girl_life, @perpetual.passion, @champsg & Fratello


B/ 39 mm DIAMETER

BEIGE (“DUNE WHITE”) DIAL: Ref. M79950-0008 (bracelet) & M79950-0011 (fabric strap)

BLACK DIAL: Ref. M79950-0001 (bracelet) & M79950-0003 (fabric strap)

39 x 12 mm steel case, Manufacture Calibre MT5402 (COSC), Waterproof to 100m (330 ft)




credit: juan_j4s & @champsg


Ranger 39 with Oyster Perpetual 41


credit: @juan_j4s




Ranger 39 with Explorer II (42 mm)



Ranger 39 with Black Bay Pro (39 mm)


credit: Hodinkee


C/ 36 & 39 mm SIDE BY SIDE

Ranger 39 (bracelet) with 36 (fabric strap)


credit: @champsg


Ranger 39 (top) with 36 (bottom)


credit: Fratello


Ranger 36 (bracelet) with 39 (fabric strap)





Ranger 36 Black and Beige (bracelet) with 39 (fabric strap)


credit: Monochrome

About the Audemars Piguet Black Bay Ref. 5400

The Audemars Piguet Royal Oak "Jumbo" reference 5400, introduced in 1972, is a foundational model for the brand and the broader luxury sports watch category. It was designed by Gérald Genta and distinguished by its integrated bracelet and octagonal bezel secured by eight visible hexagonal screws. This reference established the core aesthetic that would define the Royal Oak collection for decades, emphasizing a blend of industrial design and high-end finishing.

The 5400 features a relatively thin profile for its time, housing the ultra-thin automatic Caliber 2121 movement. The case construction, often in stainless steel, utilized a monobloc design for water resistance, with the bezel and case back secured to the mid-case. The dial typically featured a "Tapisserie" pattern, adding texture and depth, protected by a sapphire crystal.

As the original Royal Oak, the 5400 holds significant appeal for collectors interested in horological history and design innovation. Its enduring design language and technical specifications set a benchmark for a new genre of watches. Variants exist in different metals, though the steel version remains particularly sought after for its historical significance and purity of design.

Specifications

Caliber
Caliber 2121
Case
Stainless steel
Diameter
39mm
Dial
Blue
Water Resist.
50m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
BR
bruckner4
Mar 20, 2026

Wouldn't mind adding a 36mm beige one of these days. Thanks for the photo montage!

AR
Arronax
Mar 20, 2026

Lots of very likeable models in the line up, that being said every time I check one I realize I already have a similar watch in my modest collection and inevitably reach the conclusion that I don't need one. Only exception would be the gmt as I don't have one.

QU
quattro
Mar 20, 2026

and 36 seems to be a good size (not too much empty space on the dial). Best, Emmanuel

QU
quattro
Mar 20, 2026

I guess, but I wonder if 36 isn’t even better in terms of “empty space” on the dial. Best, Emmanuel

QU
quattro
Mar 20, 2026

I have a BB36, though, so this space is already taken in my collection. Best, Emmanuel

QU
quattro
Mar 20, 2026

so I guess most of us already have a watch which fills this space. What I regret about these watches is their thickness: why 11 mm for a 36? It should be below 10 for me. And the GMT is 12.8 mm: way too thick, imo. Best, Emmanuel Black Bay Pro is even 14.6 mm…

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 16 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →