
Nicolas (amanico) initiates a compelling comparison between the vintage Vulcain Cricket Nautical and its 2011 re-edition. This discussion is particularly relevant for collectors interested in how modern re-interpretations honor or diverge from their historical predecessors, especially in the context of cult diving watches. Nicolas's detailed observations highlight the nuances that define a successful homage.
The 1966 Ford Mustang represents a significant year for the model, building on the initial success of its introduction. This reference is part of the first generation, which established the Mustang as a distinct category of American automobile. It continued to offer a range of body styles and engine options, allowing for considerable personalization and appealing to a broad market segment. The 1966 model year saw refinements rather than radical changes, solidifying its design language and market position.
The vehicle's construction typically featured a steel unibody chassis. Various engine configurations were available, including inline-six and V8 options, paired with manual or automatic transmissions. Specific dimensions varied slightly depending on the body style, such as coupe, convertible, or fastback. The interior offered a functional layout, with instrumentation focused on driver information.
This reference holds interest for collectors due to its place in the early history of the Mustang and its enduring popularity. The availability of different engine and trim levels means that specific examples can vary widely in their features and performance. It remains a recognizable and sought-after classic, often celebrated at automotive events worldwide.
But - forgive my ignorance - what does it do? Best E.
I missed this watch 9 years ago at a retailer and always regretted . Indeed a beautiful piece and a must have in collection !
...is the fourth hand (red tip) on the re-edition for? And why the faux-patina?
...Does dive times/tables. Archaic. But very cool.
I notice notable differences between the original and the Also in the shape of the hands… Whilst 1961 is widely accepted, you mention 1966 for the Mk2. I am fairly surprised. I thought those 2 versions were almost concomitant/ overlapping each other earlier on. May I ask you where/ how you have come to that date. In advance thank you Z'
PS: also the original ( upper pic) had the red tipped alarm hand..
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 33 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →