Vulcain Cricket Nautical: Original vs. Re-Edition
Vintage

Vulcain Cricket Nautical: Original vs. Re-Edition

By amanico · Mar 12, 2016 · 33 replies
amanico
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
33 replies4708 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Nicolas (amanico) initiates a compelling comparison between the vintage Vulcain Cricket Nautical and its 2011 re-edition. This discussion is particularly relevant for collectors interested in how modern re-interpretations honor or diverge from their historical predecessors, especially in the context of cult diving watches. Nicolas's detailed observations highlight the nuances that define a successful homage.

Re Editions of cult diving watches are a popular exercise of style. 

We often mention the two stars of the category, the Longines diver and the Polaris. 

Both re edtions being very close to the original. While the Blancpain FFs and the Rolex Sub are more modern evocations. 

But we rarely discuss another great watch, the Vulcain Cricket Nautical. 

I am working on an article on that watch, but in the meantime, I wanted to show you two pictures I found on the net. 

The original:





And now, the re edition, issued in 2011: 




Please note that this is the first one, the one from 1961. There was another one, in 1966, which was very close. 

The main difference between the 1961 and the 1966, the shape of the lugs, beveled ala Polaris. 

So, here, the dial of the Hommage is very close, not to say identical to the original. The case, too. The hands are different, as you can see. 

The movement is manual in both cases. 

I have to say that it is a very nice re edition. Which is worth some interest. 

What do you think? 

Best,

Nicolas

About the Fiat Ref. 1966

The 1966 Ford Mustang represents a significant year for the model, building on the initial success of its introduction. This reference is part of the first generation, which established the Mustang as a distinct category of American automobile. It continued to offer a range of body styles and engine options, allowing for considerable personalization and appealing to a broad market segment. The 1966 model year saw refinements rather than radical changes, solidifying its design language and market position.

The vehicle's construction typically featured a steel unibody chassis. Various engine configurations were available, including inline-six and V8 options, paired with manual or automatic transmissions. Specific dimensions varied slightly depending on the body style, such as coupe, convertible, or fastback. The interior offered a functional layout, with instrumentation focused on driver information.

This reference holds interest for collectors due to its place in the early history of the Mustang and its enduring popularity. The availability of different engine and trim levels means that specific examples can vary widely in their features and performance. It remains a recognizable and sought-after classic, often celebrated at automotive events worldwide.

Specifications

Caliber
B18
Case
Steel
Diameter
40.5mm
Dial
Black
Water Resist.
100m
Crystal
Glass

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
ES
Esharp
Mar 12, 2016

But - forgive my ignorance - what does it do? Best E.

HO
Horology75
Mar 12, 2016

I missed this watch 9 years ago at a retailer and always regretted . Indeed a beautiful piece and a must have in collection !

BD
BDLJ
Mar 12, 2016

...is the fourth hand (red tip) on the re-edition for? And why the faux-patina?

BD
BDLJ
Mar 12, 2016

...Does dive times/tables. Archaic. But very cool.

ZT
ztirual
Mar 12, 2016

I notice notable differences between the original and the Also in the shape of the hands… Whilst 1961 is widely accepted, you mention 1966 for the Mk2. I am fairly surprised. I thought those 2 versions were almost concomitant/ overlapping each other earlier on. May I ask you where/ how you have come to that date. In advance thank you Z'

HS
hs111
Mar 12, 2016

PS: also the original ( upper pic) had the red tipped alarm hand..

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 33 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →