
Watch Commission's humorous take on the 'right' number of watches in a collection sparks a relatable discussion for many enthusiasts. His journey from casual ownership to serious collecting, culminating in a witty mathematical challenge involving perpetual calendars and leap years, invites readers to ponder their own collecting philosophies. This article synthesizes community insights on managing, categorizing, and enjoying a diverse watch collection.

I would say that 12 watches is the good number. But I have some place in my heart for 24. So, I'd say somewhere between 12 and 24. Now, if you ask me what wold be my one and only one watch, I mean if I had to just keep one, it would be easier for me to answer. Best, Nicolas
Realistically, a more manageable number maybe around 30-50? That should give one sufficient room for a multi brand collection.
1 doesnt work, because if it needs service you have none. I once had 22 go into service at the same time. If I have more than 4, I dont wear any o f them enough. 1x year would make me miss some too much.
5 in the box, 1 on the wrist. 4 cover all occasions from formal to adventure, and I add a couple just for pleasure of collecting. Beyond that number I get uncomfortable (maintenance, not wearing each enough etc.)
.... now let me get on the list for 1455 watches... hanks
They cover just about every situation or event that I expect to encounter.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 59 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →