
Dr. Tabby, known as Spangles on WatchProSite, delves into a fascinating and often debated aspect of watch dial design: the 'eaten six.' This editorial explores the historical context of this design element, particularly its prevalence in pocket watches, and invites collectors to share their aesthetic preferences for sub-seconds dial layouts. Dr. Tabby's original post sparks a lively discussion on whether a partial numeral, a dot, or a complete absence of the six is most appealing.





Certainly, in my opinion, the examples you’ve shown are nicer with the eaten 6. Regards Kev.
Not optimal, but better than leaving what looks like a zero in that space. I might personalize the 6 to make it stand out, like Bedat does with their number 8. Kurt
But one look at that gorgeous Omega and I could easily live with it! That’s a real beauty.
How about shrinking the six down, a little like how FPJ handles some numerals on some watches?
Well, maybe not, but they'd have some beautiful watches!
On many watches there is no 3, because of a date window. An eaten 6 is a creative way design of a dial. Yes, the pocket watch heritage of smal seconds is the reason. Should i buy a watch with an eaten 6? No, because i chose watches with a central second hand. Ever seen a Rolex day date with smal second hand in a dial? No. Only a Daytona have it, and a yachtmaster chronograph.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 89 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →