Discussion
Thomas_3 initiates a compelling discussion on the true necessity of watch complications, challenging collectors to reflect on their preferences beyond basic timekeeping. His perspective, favoring simplicity due to practical considerations like legibility, sets the stage for a nuanced exploration of what truly drives the acquisition of complex mechanical timepieces. This article synthesizes community insights, offering a diverse range of opinions on the appeal and utility of various horological functions.
As these are the complications I use the most. And some watches do both of them...
That's why I bought my FF Bathyscaphe. Simple, tells the time frighteningly accurately, has just the date (which I need in my line of work), and is robust enough to do the activities I do in life. It's also luxurious enough; great finishing and very nice aesthetics. I don't need much more than this, and frankly, after learning about upkeep costs or the possibility of breakage, I'm not interested in high comps.
For one a QP+chrono for sure: The ultimate dream watch would be a Sonata chrono QP
On my wish list I do have more chrono and possible one PC but mostly because these specific reference trigger emotion for me! Great topic BTW!
It can serve a purpose - time, home time, elapsed time and (except for Nico) date, etc It can remind you of something intrinsic about the solar system - moonphase, equation of time, etc The innovation, technology and craftsmanship can impress and delight the eye - like the tourbillon Oh, and it can be beautiful😀
A retrograde jump hour with deadbeat seconds a date window and a GMT chapter Ring should do it 😂
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 41 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
