Watch Forum Community Discussion

WPS member · Horological Meandering forum

22 replies4133 views3 photos

Dr No, a respected moderator on WatchProSite, addresses the community regarding the forum's content moderation policy, particularly concerning geopolitical discussions. He frames the conversation by sharing a personal anecdote about his father's colleague, Angelo Chatas, a D-Day hero, to underscore the value of freedom and its responsible exercise. Dr No's post clarifies the forum's singular focus on luxury watches and related enjoyable aspects of life, advocating for the preservation of this dedicated space amidst global events.

22 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

. . . and the manner in which we conduct ourselves here.

Yesterday I posted about my father's colleague, Angelo Chatas. The villagers of Ste Marie du Mont were so grateful for his heroics during D-Day that they named a street after him.

[photo courtesy pplater]

It's difficult to make out, but the rectangular white sign above the posted 30 kph speed limit reads 'Allee Angelo Chatas'.

Angelo risked his life so that others, as well as future generations, could live freely. The benefits we derive from living in a free country are many, with freedom of speech being foremost.

There are those who ask why we - the moderators of Watchprosite - are deleting or editing threads and posts in support of Ukraine. The answer is simple: our forum exists for a single purpose, to share the passion all members of the community have for wristwatches and other enjoyable aspects of life.

There are other venues to express our feelings regarding calamities currently in the news. Our sole purpose is to allow people around the world express their interest in and appreciation for wristwatches.

Please, let's keep it that way.

Art

Key Points from the Discussion

One member expressed strong disagreement with the moderation policy, stating that the current geopolitical situation is too significant to be ignored. This member indicated a willingness to leave the forum if unable to express their feelings on the matter.
A contributor challenged Dr No's previous statement about 'objective opinion,' clarifying that all opinions are inherently subjective. They emphasized the importance of making truly objective statements only when thoroughly researched and not intended to stir subjective feelings.
A user highlighted concerns about censorship, particularly regarding negative opinions on watches. They argued that moderators should allow diverse views on watches, even critical ones, as long as they do not offend owners. The user also questioned the tolerance of 'disreputable jokes or sexist pictures' while political discussions are banned.
Dr No responded to the critique about 'objective opinion' by rephrasing his earlier statement to 'what may be an undisputed opinion to you may not be to someone else,' seeking to clarify the intent behind the moderation.
Another member supported the moderators' efforts, appreciating the forum as a 'welcome antidote' to global news. They emphasized the value of WatchProSite's dedicated watch and related content for providing a respite from difficult current events.
A contributor acknowledged that free speech rights vary globally and are even eroding in some places, but ultimately agreed that WatchProSite should remain primarily a watch forum, with other topics like cars and wine as secondary, and political discussions reserved for other platforms.

The Discussion

mdg

Mar 3, 2022

...but many countries (probably most?) do not have anything resembling a first amendment right to free speech. Even the one we have in the US is being eroded every day... But I do agree with the sentiment...this is a watch forum first and foremost. Then some cars, wine, jokes, etc. But if you want to talk politics, take it up on Twitter. Until you're banned, of course : )

myles721

Mar 3, 2022

This is one of the few places I can come to get away from what we have to look at every single day on the news…

Michael Reilly

Mar 3, 2022

I probably agree, as hard as it is for me to agree. Bastard. Lol

AuHavrePro

Mar 3, 2022

The one thing I am in objective disagreement with is your statement just before you locked the previous thread 'What may be an objective opinion to you...' Clearly, there is no such thing as 'an objective opinion'. All opinions are subjective and as such, I never interject mine where it isn't asked for, and when I do wish to make any kind of truly objective (obviously, there exists such a thing) statement it is made purely on sheer goodwill, and thoroughly researched academic ground. It isn't me

AuHavrePro

Mar 4, 2022

Excellent point.... This speech from veteran Travis Haley that he made way back in 2013 resonates to the fullest extent to this day, as if he had made it presently....

Dr No

Mar 4, 2022

. . . 'what may be an undisputed opinion to you may not be to someone else'. Better?

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 22 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

More from this Forum